"Money is a personal thing.
For a lot of guys, saving for a bunch of years to go on a hunt for a guy, another $500, 1000, 1500, 2000 might not be possible.
You tip what you want, you tip what you like, you tip what you can afford. Same as anything else.
It's nuts that a hunter, should be told by a guide not to come if he can't tip x. If you went to a steak house and the waitress stood outside and shook you down for 20% would you come in?"
Mojave nailed it.
I did 15-16 remote flyout hunts in Alaska over the past 22 years. The first 4 were guided, the last 10-11 were unguided. In those 22 years I have been into a lot of remote AK locations, and rubbed elbows with a whole lot of guides and hunters who were guided.
Based on my personal experience and all of the other hunters/guides that I came in contact with, my personal opinion is that a very select group might warrant a 15-20% tip; the rest of them are still learning their trade, or don't have the planning/logistics/people/problem solving skills to deserve anywhere near that amount.
A percentage tip for a big game hunt is a dumb idea right out of the gate, for everyone but the guide. I paid $9,000 for a guided moose hunt in the early 2000s. The cost of guided moose hunts is now $25,000 - $30,000 in Alaska. Why should the "industry standard" tip for the guide be 3 times what it was in the early 2000s, when:
- The hunter's income likely did NOT triple over that timeframe
- The animal numbers in most places in Alaska dictate that the 2024 hunter will NOT likely have as good a hunt experience as I had in the early 2000s
- The hunter is NOT getting 3 times the service that was provided to me; why should he pay 3 times as much for it?
I laugh when I read someone say that if someone can't afford to tip, the hunter shouldn't book the hunt. Let's turn that around and see how it sounds:
If the guide/outfitter can't afford to work for the base rate without a tip, they shouldn't be in this business.