How does the modern military clothing compare with hunting clothing?

eltorro

FNG
Joined
Jan 5, 2025
Messages
40
As the hunting season is changing gears from cool to cold, I’d like to know if others have looked into what clothing is available outside the Sitka/Kuiu/FL/ etc.
There seem to be some great companies making clothing for military contracts that fit the bill, such as Arktis, UF Pro or even the Leaf from Arc’teryx.
There are other outdoor brands - especially in Europe, but most of those cater to organized hunts. However, let’s not discount them either.
What do you think? Anyone tried them?
 
I am not backcountry hunting. I just get up before first light and hunt until I am successful or it gets dark. I am still using most of my issued gear (the CIF lost my records at one of my duty stations and I ended up carting around almost two full issues for most of my time on AD). I’ve also used it on a couple of camping trips (I don’t generally like camping, it’s too much like work). I supplement it with military surplus ponchos and similar things.

I think that it is probably heavier than top of the line civilian gear, but I also figure that I can use it until it no longer works and save money to spend on ammo. I also don’t mind using it hard (but not abusing it). It feels far more durable than the mid-priced gear I see in stores. I get horrible sticker shock whenever I look at a lot of the gear on Form’s list or that others on this forum discuss.

I have an old LBV covered in surplus utility pouches. Every time I lift it and put it on my shoulders, I know that I have too much weight on it and there has to be a better solution, but I haven’t seen it yet. I will have to evaluate what I don’t need before the next hunting trip.

I wear old cammies and old boots whenever I go hunting. I did have to semi-retire my mountain boots from 2010 because they started to feel very cramped in the toes. I replaced them with a pair of surplus cold weather Bellevilles. They are heavy and clunky, but they seem perfect for a day hike in the cold. And I picked up a pair of Army-issue cold weather boots with removable inserts. They are also heavy and clunky. But the two pairs of boots was less than $100 and should last me a long time as all-day cold weather boots in which I can still hunt for 6-10 hours or hike to a chokepoint to sit down for 3-4 hours without freezing.

Apart from the sticker shock, I just don’t have a lot of confidence that some of this expensive gear will actually hold up to field conditions. I tried looking for a pair of pants that could handle following a deer trail through blackberries or wait-a-minute bushes and became convinced that a lot of this stuff is “outdoor lifestyle clothing.” I don’t have stores nearby where I can see this stuff in person. And a lot of folks on here said things like, “why wouldn’t you just go around that stuff?,” which told me all I needed to know about their confidence in it. So, I got a pair of old-fashioned tin cloth chaps. I’ll try them out when they get here.
 
We’ve all used military surplus stuff, it is good and gets things done. It also seems to last a long time.
What about the new generation of “high-end”, aimed mostly at high-performance teams?
 
I have never been in the military, but several of my friends that have, share this meme or some variant thereof with me, regularly.

1000015263.jpg


I have no first hand knowledge to contribute, other than I wore old school "Proper" BDU pants and jacket in woodland camo for years while hunting when I was younger. Picked them up at a military surplus store for cheap. Actually pretty sturdy, dried fast if I got them wet, and I had no complaints other than they weren't water proof.
 
I have most of the pieces in the ECWCS line. I know this is not recent but it works very well together or as stand alone pieces. I still take my level 1,2 and 3 backpack hunting, I really like how fleece handles sweat and how quickly it is dry again.
 
Military? No. But lots of brands are better than hunting brands depending on the task.

Just because Exo has made packs a some military unit doesn't make military packs great. Some goes for Arc'teryx, Etc.
 
Yeah I have a few of the old ecws pieces, they are bulky but will keep you warm! Few of the patagucci too, honestly the old cotton acu’s/ multicam tops and bottoms are decent for busting brush and warm weather stuff. I don’t know how anything holds up in AZ between cats paw and mesquite everything is trying to tear or poke holes in you.
 
Pick and choose wisely but stay away from those FRACU trousers we were issued in A-stan

I’m not going to post all of the photos I have of Joe’s with the FRACU trouser crotch torn wide open. It usually occurred whenever we took a knee on patrol.

Remember usually lowest bidder wins the contract, but I did like some of the ecws stuff.
 
Pick and choose wisely but stay away from those FRACU trousers we were issued in A-stan

I’m not going to post all of the photos I have of Joe’s with the FRACU trouser crotch torn wide open. It usually occurred whenever we took a knee on patrol.

Remember usually lowest bidder wins the contract, but I did like some of the ecws stuff.

Those are just the normal air holes to keep your balls cool. I think that out of a dozen pairs of cammies, only two or three don’t have the crotch vent upgrade (CVU).
 
I looked at your title, read what others wrote, then went back to your post. Your post is asking about specific gear from specific companies.

You are dealing with more weight from issued clothing. I don't use the brands you mentioned, so my comments will be more in general. You may have to give us a little more info on how you are using the clothing and what you expect it to do.
 
I am not backcountry hunting. I just get up before first light and hunt until I am successful or it gets dark. I am still using most of my issued gear (the CIF lost my records at one of my duty stations and I ended up carting around almost two full issues for most of my time on AD). I’ve also used it on a couple of camping trips (I don’t generally like camping, it’s too much like work). I supplement it with military surplus ponchos and similar things.

I think that it is probably heavier than top of the line civilian gear, but I also figure that I can use it until it no longer works and save money to spend on ammo. I also don’t mind using it hard (but not abusing it). It feels far more durable than the mid-priced gear I see in stores. I get horrible sticker shock whenever I look at a lot of the gear on Form’s list or that others on this forum discuss.

I have an old LBV covered in surplus utility pouches. Every time I lift it and put it on my shoulders, I know that I have too much weight on it and there has to be a better solution, but I haven’t seen it yet. I will have to evaluate what I don’t need before the next hunting trip.

I wear old cammies and old boots whenever I go hunting. I did have to semi-retire my mountain boots from 2010 because they started to feel very cramped in the toes. I replaced them with a pair of surplus cold weather Bellevilles. They are heavy and clunky, but they seem perfect for a day hike in the cold. And I picked up a pair of Army-issue cold weather boots with removable inserts. They are also heavy and clunky. But the two pairs of boots was less than $100 and should last me a long time as all-day cold weather boots in which I can still hunt for 6-10 hours or hike to a chokepoint to sit down for 3-4 hours without freezing.

Apart from the sticker shock, I just don’t have a lot of confidence that some of this expensive gear will actually hold up to field conditions. I tried looking for a pair of pants that could handle following a deer trail through blackberries or wait-a-minute bushes and became convinced that a lot of this stuff is “outdoor lifestyle clothing.” I don’t have stores nearby where I can see this stuff in person. And a lot of folks on here said things like, “why wouldn’t you just go around that stuff?,” which told me all I needed to know about their confidence in it. So, I got a pair of old-fashioned tin cloth chaps. I’ll try them out when they get here.


This is a pretty good take on everything. Where the big game "hunting lifestyle" brands excel over cheaper hunting stuff, quality tradesmen's clothing, or some of the military surplus stuff, seems to be in very niche situations, or in ways where you get pretty extreme diminishing returns over costs.

Mostly though, like in Britain, a lot of the hunting clothing decisions seem to be worn more as a tribal uniform or class statement than as the best option for a task. When I see a guy dressed head to toe only in Kuiu, or only in Sitka, etc, it's kind of a dead-giveaway that they're flying a flag of tribal affiliation more than dialing in on the best toolset for a given task. And that is entirely separate from just how suspect a lot of their "scientific" camo pattern claims are.

Some of the places where actual hunting brands seem to have worthwhile pieces, is with more technical stuff - or simply technical stuff similar to what "civilian" outdoor brands offer, but in camo. A good example in western big game is some of the stuff for being camo'd up and glassing or stalking in extreme heat and sun. Sun-shade hoodies, for one. Extremely lightweight, full arm sleeves and a hood, often with UV protection, meant to protect your skin from the sun but made of materials that won't bake you under the sun. There are a lot of fishing, beachwear, and hiking offerings for those, but not a lot that would be good colors or patterns to hunt mule deer in. So, that's a solid niche for a hunting brand to offer something in.

But Duluth pants or old .mil gear works just fine in brush-busting for quail, chukar, or sage hen.

One big exception to all this though is waterfowling gear. There's virtually nothing in the civilian world that will allow you to sit in driving wind and rain at 34F, in a marsh, be absolutely warm and comfy and dry, and still be camo enough for the birds to not see you.
 
I don’t like military stuff, grew up wearing military hand me downs ( Korean War & Vietnam War area) and suffered terribly, I frankly don’t know how my grandfather and dad didn’t die of exposure and cold , back in the 70’s
That stuff was junk, I don’t mind paying a little extra for modern technology
But I don’t buy anything fancy brands , I do like the extreme weather clothing the RECORD BREAKING HUNTER wears on his channel on YouTube, but I suspect it is very very expensive?
 
I looked at your title, read what others wrote, then went back to your post. Your post is asking about specific gear from specific companies.

You are dealing with more weight from issued clothing. I don't use the brands you mentioned, so my comments will be more in general. You may have to give us a little more info on how you are using the clothing and what you expect it to do.
Very observant and correct.
I was referring to the higher-end military clothing. I think we may have all used the surplus stuff or what remained from what was issued to us, but that was heavy, uncomfortable and best suited as a low budget option. If we were to focus on western hunting, gear selection for long hunting days of 10+ miles, is a bit more important.
Modern gear that starts with Crye, Arkteryx Leaf… etc. demand a pretty penny, often higher than the hunting brands. Was wondering if anyone has tried them to compare with Kuiu, Sitka …etc.
From the specs, there would be a difference in “no melt no drip” and durability, obviously. But I’ve never worn them so ….
 
I would worry far more about qaulity of my boots,pack and sleeping bag. Wear my walmart wranglers and "old" surplus and go hunt. For me this stuff has worked great for the last 3 years backpack Sheep hunting 9-10 day trips each year. The "cutting edge " military stuff is probably amazing but from what I have seen it is also almost unattainable as well as just as much or more cost wise as the main hunting brands.
 
I retired in 2015 after 30+ years of service in Army Infantry. I still use my ECWS and similar pieces at PRS or hunting. Slowly but surely being consumed. I have Kuiu, Sitka, etc. also but my "surplus" gear serves me well.
 
woolpower was/still issued in some armies under the name ulfrotte. but i do not think that i will use what was issued to me in the 80s except that kind of wool that im using but bought brand new few years ago ...
 
Very observant and correct.
I was referring to the higher-end military clothing. I think we may have all used the surplus stuff or what remained from what was issued to us, but that was heavy, uncomfortable and best suited as a low budget option. If we were to focus on western hunting, gear selection for long hunting days of 10+ miles, is a bit more important.
Modern gear that starts with Crye, Arkteryx Leaf… etc. demand a pretty penny, often higher than the hunting brands. Was wondering if anyone has tried them to compare with Kuiu, Sitka …etc.
From the specs, there would be a difference in “no melt no drip” and durability, obviously. But I’ve never worn them so ….
Well, let's look at military gear, it wasn't designed to last ages, it can be replaced by a GSO, more likely a JSO, fairly easily if something gets destroyed. If it only lasts a couple missions, so be it.

Most of us want our gear to last longer than that, I can still fit in BDU's bought in the early 80's, and they still are useful for turkey hunting and warmer weather hunting. I don't think any of this newer stuff is going to last that long.

I'm not knocking the guys on here, but I see a lot that want Sitka, First Lite, Kuiu, etc.

So, some brands to consider, Carinthia, Helicon Tex, Tru Spec --- I would say Crye, but those are expensive.

Look at a site, Varuste.net, I've used them a lot for base layers, etc. They are easy to work with, shipping is "fast enough" if I don't need it in 2 days like Am$%^&. You pay a little in import fees, but just the price of doing business and getting quality products.
 
I love the milsurp stuff for my outer layer. It is far more durable than my fragile Kuiu gear. The zippers are robust and quiet and there are usually plenty of pockets. The camo patterns are as good as the civilian market stuff for most environs. The ACU digital pattern is perfect in my mind for hunting pronghorn in sagebrush country. Another pattern works fine for woodlands.

I hunt primarily in the southeast where the woods are full of multiflora rose, hawthorn, blackberry brambles and other thorny stuff that will shred the exterior of my Kuiu mid or outer layer gear in 30 minutes of walking. The milsurp pants and wind jacket hold up to it just fine. I do cut the threads on all the velcro patches to get them off.
 
Back
Top