Help me improve my spotting scope set up

Loper

WKR
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
1,127
For the past few years I’ve been using an Athlon Cronus 12-36x50 on a Vortex Summit tripod.

I bought the spotter because it was lightweight, compact and affordable. I bought the tripod, because I really didn’t know much about tripods and it seemed like a good deal and was lightweight.

This is a budget set up and I’ve found myself not using the spotter much or preferring to use my binos instead. Sometimes I don’t even put the spotter and tripod in my pack because I don’t feel like fooling with it. The adapter plate from the tripod to the spotter is finicky and rotating the head isn’t very smooth.

For a long time, I thought I was just impatient and didn’t like to look behind a spotting scope for a long time. However, after upgrading my binos recently, I’ve realized that glassing isn’t as dreadful as I once thought it is.

Now I’m thinking, that upgrading my spotter, tripod, and/or head may help me to actually enjoy glassing.

If you were in my shoes, which would you upgrade first, the spotting scope, the tripod, or the head? My budget for this year is about $1,000-$1,500 and I’m hoping I can find a Black Friday deal to help stretch what I can afford. I’ve noticed the Kowa 553 is 50% off which seems like a pretty good deal. However, I wonder if I should invest in a better tripod and head first, use the spotter I have for next season, and save up some more money and upgrade the spotter after next year
 

nnmarcher

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
228

svivian

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
3,223
Location
Colorado

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,254
For the past few years I’ve been using an Athlon Cronus 12-36x50 on a Vortex Summit tripod.

I bought the spotter because it was lightweight, compact and affordable. I bought the tripod, because I really didn’t know much about tripods and it seemed like a good deal and was lightweight.

This is a budget set up and I’ve found myself not using the spotter much or preferring to use my binos instead. Sometimes I don’t even put the spotter and tripod in my pack because I don’t feel like fooling with it. The adapter plate from the tripod to the spotter is finicky and rotating the head isn’t very smooth.

For a long time, I thought I was just impatient and didn’t like to look behind a spotting scope for a long time. However, after upgrading my binos recently, I’ve realized that glassing isn’t as dreadful as I once thought it is.

Now I’m thinking, that upgrading my spotter, tripod, and/or head may help me to actually enjoy glassing.

If you were in my shoes, which would you upgrade first, the spotting scope, the tripod, or the head? My budget for this year is about $1,000-$1,500 and I’m hoping I can find a Black Friday deal to help stretch what I can afford. I’ve noticed the Kowa 553 is 50% off which seems like a pretty good deal. However, I wonder if I should invest in a better tripod and head first, use the spotter I have for next season, and save up some more money and upgrade the spotter after next year
In normal mountain breezy conditions I’ve used a $100 well-used loaner scope not worth hunting with paired with a rock steady tripod and saw numerous hard to pick out animals just as well as my friend with a swaro spotter and cheap tripod. Of course his scope on a good tripod is ideal, but never underestimate how nice a steady image is.
 

gr8fuldoug

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
5,404
Location
Old Bethpage, NY
The best spotter is worth nothing on an unstable tripod. A fair spotter improves on a better tripod.

Give a call and speak with Joel, our resident tripod guru, and he can discuss options and Black Friday deals with you, 516-217-1000

Happy Thanksgiving
 
OP
L

Loper

WKR
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
1,127
The Kowa 553 seems like a screaming deal. There are some great deals in the classifieds for tripods and heads too. I am not affiliated with this seller https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/tricer-bc-tripod-outdoorsman-micro-pan-head.383331/#post-3905499

but you could buy that tripod/head combo and the Kowa and come out ~$75 over budget. You could certainly recover that selling your old scope and tripod.

Thank you for this link and the suggestion as I’m not an expert on tripods and just started researching them recently.

How does that Tricer BC tripod compare to the Aziak backcountry lite tripod? It appears that the Tricer (27 oz) is heavier than the Aziak (18.9 oz). It better to have a little heavier tripod for stability?


 

Maverick1

WKR
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
1,843
For the past few years I’ve been using an Athlon Cronus 12-36x50 on a Vortex Summit tripod.

I bought the spotter because it was lightweight, compact and affordable. I bought the tripod, because I really didn’t know much about tripods and it seemed like a good deal and was lightweight.

This is a budget set up and I’ve found myself not using the spotter much or preferring to use my binos instead. Sometimes I don’t even put the spotter and tripod in my pack because I don’t feel like fooling with it. The adapter plate from the tripod to the spotter is finicky and rotating the head isn’t very smooth.

For a long time, I thought I was just impatient and didn’t like to look behind a spotting scope for a long time. However, after upgrading my binos recently, I’ve realized that glassing isn’t as dreadful as I once thought it is.

Now I’m thinking, that upgrading my spotter, tripod, and/or head may help me to actually enjoy glassing.

If you were in my shoes, which would you upgrade first, the spotting scope, the tripod, or the head? My budget for this year is about $1,000-$1,500 and I’m hoping I can find a Black Friday deal to help stretch what I can afford. I’ve noticed the Kowa 553 is 50% off which seems like a pretty good deal. However, I wonder if I should invest in a better tripod and head first, use the spotter I have for next season, and save up some more money and upgrade the spotter after next year
I’d suggest ditching the smaller spotting scope and trying binoculars on a tripod.
 

nnmarcher

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
228
Thank you for this link and the suggestion as I’m not an expert on tripods and just started researching them recently.

How does that Tricer BC tripod compare to the Aziak backcountry lite tripod? It appears that the Tricer (27 oz) is heavier than the Aziak (18.9 oz). It better to have a little heavier tripod for stability?


I don't have experience with either tripod unfortunately, so I will let others with experience comment on the two. I've seen good reviews for both. I would guess that the Tricer's weight probably helps with better stability.
 
OP
L

Loper

WKR
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
1,127
In normal mountain breezy conditions I’ve used a $100 well-used loaner scope not worth hunting with paired with a rock steady tripod and saw numerous hard to pick out animals just as well as my friend with a swaro spotter and cheap tripod. Of course his scope on a good tripod is ideal, but never underestimate how nice a steady image is.
Thanks. This is good to know. I definitely will be upgrading my tripod.
 
OP
L

Loper

WKR
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
1,127
I’d suggest ditching the smaller spotting scope and trying binoculars on a tripod.
Are you suggesting I ditch my current spotting scope and use binos on the tripod, or ditch a small spotter all together? If the latter, can you provide some additional info why you suggest not having a small spotting scope? Thanks.
 

Maverick1

WKR
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
1,843
Are you suggesting I ditch my current spotting scope and use binos on the tripod, or ditch a small spotter all together? If the latter, can you provide some additional info why you suggest not having a small spotting scope? Thanks.
Ditch the small spotting scope setup all together. I use 10x42 and 12x50 binoculars on a tripod and find that setup to more effective and enjoyable than the two small spotting scopes I once owned (brand of small spotters is irrelevant, they were of medium and high quality; sold both.) Can use the small binos on a chest harness (or handhold) - while hunting - and on the tripod - while glassing. At longer distances, the small spotter was not giving me much more information than the binoculars were, and using just one eye at a time was a bit fatiguing. Found the binos to be more valuable, and less weight to carry around. (If you are counting rings on an animal, or breaking down the potential scope of a specific animal from a long distance, that might be a different story, but I was not - and will not - be doing those types of things from a distance.)
 
Top