Hearing protection act (suppressors) introduced

[Sccritterkiller]

Heck, I you want to do that why not put a $200 fee to purchase a firearm? Put the money towards p/r act. How about a $200 fee for mountain bikes? list could go on forever. P/R funds have been mis-spent for decades, fees won't help.

Now your just gas lighting... Why would I want, for example, a shotgun something I will never put a supressor on to cost $200 bucks more, not to mention would almost double the cost of 22LR.

 

[butcherboy]

It would be great if this got passed but I still won’t buy a suppressor.

 

[thinhorn_AK]

Has everybody already forgotten when Donald Trump said he doesn't like silencers, then went on to ban bump stocks?

 

[Wrench]

Except for the RHINO's . It would be nice if we could get some common sense stuff going for sure. 4473 and take it home.

Hand the seller the money and go home. It wasn't that long ago that guns were mailed to you from a catalog.

 

[Wrench]

Has everybody already forgotten when Donald Trump said he doesn't like silencers, then went on to ban bump stocks?

That was planned. Look at it from a little farther away....he knew it was unconstitutional and it made for a ruling that protected us all from the executive branch over reaching.

Trust me, I wanted to beat his ass until I looked at it higher level. Everything he's doing is chess, and most of the world is thinking checkers.

 

[Dos XX]

Hand the seller the money and go home. It wasn't that long ago that guns were mailed to you from a catalog.

My first gun came from Sears Roebuck and had Ted Williams' name on it.

 

[Wrench]

My first gun came from Sears Roebuck and had Ted Williams' name on it.

Exactly what I mean.

You could buy as many sks rifles as you wanted for $29-39 each.....to your door without paperwork or hassle.

 

[TheTone]

I’d be super curious if suppressor manufacturers actually want this passed. As is currently they’re a little harder to get thus a little more limited in supply meaning they can charge a lot for what’s a pretty simple device. If this passes and they’re readily available I’d guess prices will drop substantially

 

[CorbLand]

It would be great if this got passed but I still won’t buy a suppressor.

Why not?

 

[ChrisA]

I’d be super curious if suppressor manufacturers actually want this passed. As is currently they’re a little harder to get thus a little more limited in supply meaning they can charge a lot for what’s a pretty simple device. If this passes and they’re readily available I’d guess prices will drop substantially

Makes sense. Anybody with a lathe and knee mill could make one too.

 

[CorbLand]

I’d be super curious if suppressor manufacturers actually want this passed. As is currently they’re a little harder to get thus a little more limited in supply meaning they can charge a lot for what’s a pretty simple device. If this passes and they’re readily available I’d guess prices will drop substantially

If they still require a 4473, I don’t think it would do much. The stamp really only financially limits buyers, not manufactures ability to produce.

Unless it opens up demand to a level that more suppliers jump in, then it could have an effect but I would doubt it.

 

[9.3koolaid]

That was planned. Look at it from a little farther away....he knew it was unconstitutional and it made for a ruling that protected us all from the executive branch over reaching.

Trust me, I wanted to beat his ass until I looked at it higher level. Everything he's doing is chess, and most of the world is thinking checkers.

We're too dumb to understand that banning bumpstocks actually was good for the 2nd amendment, got it.

 

[thinhorn_AK]

That was planned. Look at it from a little farther away....he knew it was unconstitutional and it made for a ruling that protected us all from the executive branch over reaching.

Trust me, I wanted to beat his ass until I looked at it higher level. Everything he's doing is chess, and most of the world is thinking checkers.

Do your parents know you’re on the Internet???