Brian is a good guy just trying to make a living in a way that a lot of us probably wish we could.
I was in the media industry for a while years ago and the permit cost friction is a real deal. Laws and regulation for “commercial” production are geared around a big Hollywood type film or TV shoot that could involve dozens of not hundreds of people. In addition to the costs your permit application has to be signed off on by biologist, botanists, veterinarians and on and on and on. Cottage industries spring up to satisfy the requirements and it adds tons to production costs. the rules are older and aren’t geared for 1-3 people filming a hunt on a digicam while practicing glow impact camping. As written, they scoop up everyone from a Hollywood production like Dances with Wolves to potentially your kids tick tok video shot in the parking lot.
In fact, in California, I think to film with animals as primary players you would need a supervising veterinarian and a paid representative of the SPCA to assure there was not mistreatment or cruelty so I don’t you could actually kill anything on film, in California as the rules are written unless you had a REALLY cool SPCA rep.
Yeah...I get it. Brian is making his case and he does make some money on this stuff, but if you really dig into it, he has a valid point. The rules are misaligned with the use case. Besides, I would think having people like him,
@Randy Newberg , meateater and others showcase hunting opportunities on public land and filmed in a low impact, positive way promotes the use of public lands and probably brings in a lot of revenue for the same lands in the form of permits and visitation. It honestly probably also drives revenue for gear companies, outfitters and local businesses in those areas too.
As a reminder, US hunters fell from 17 million in 1980 to 11 million a few years ago. While the US added 100 million pops, so hunters went from 7% to 3%. We are a shrinking minority, and to survive and thrive, hunting has to have a positive public image that engages in thoughtful dialogue and presents a well packaged media presence to the non hunting public. If we don’t have that, age, apathy and the anti hunting crowd will erode the sport little by little by little and the early casualties will be public land hunting. So I will support anyone who is putting out solid, thoughtful, well-reasoned content like Brian.