Not sure about gen 5. There were some slight spec differences for gen 4. see below. I think most people were GTG with a barrel swap for plinking and ranger time but you ma want to get some magazines and swap your extractor for a full conversion (not sure about gen 5 extractor though for 357 sig). 357 sig was a heck of a cartridge. Seems like it kind of died on the vine. TBH the .40 is a little out of favor from what I gather. I think 30 years ago, you could have made a legit argument for 40 and 357 sig as a better anti social round Over 9mm. But a lot of that perspective was drive by guys with a bias toward 357 and 45 looking at ballistic data from guys like Evan Marshal. 9mm FMJ and pre1990s hollow points just weren’t that well regarded. Newer hollow points are pretty potent in 9mm. Combine modern shooting tactics with higher ammo costs and the added wear 40s put on guns and how it is slightly harder to qualify for the average officer and it seems like, they are falling out of favor In the broader LEO community.
(1) Magazine Follower:
The follower cartridge-bearing profile is different between the two calibers (differences are reduced in the most recent versions), and the follower is longer (deeper) in the tube for .357SIG than .40SW.
(2) Factory Standard Fixed Rear Sight:
Elevation of 6.5mm applies to G22, G23, G27, and G33;
Elevation of 6.9mm applies to G31, G32.
(3) Trigger Mechanism Housing/Ejector:
Trigger Mechanism Housing with Ejector 1882 (Part 1896) applies to
pre-Generation 4 .357SIG and .40SW.
Trigger Mechanism Housing with Ejector 30499 (Part 30561) applies to
Generation 4 .357SIG.
Trigger Mechanism Housing with Ejector 28926 (Part 28927) applies to
Generation 4 .40SW.