Gauging interest Would you buy?

[RWT]

Considering the “would you buy” thread for the Rokscope. As we wait for its release is there a requirement you would forgo if it meets the minimum standard of reliability to hold zero?

What are you willing to compromise on and in what order ?

Dimensions - does it fit the mag range and size you want?

Reticle- Mil or usable

Price - sub $1000

Illumination- yes or no

Glass- has to be mid range

Weight - 20 oz or less

Zero stop - yes or no

Dialing turrets - yes or no



What requirement is the first to be compromised if it meets the hold zero standard?

 

[Scottyboy]

Illumination 1st, weight a close 2nd

 

[jfk69]

Illumination.

 

[Ucsdryder]

The one thing I wouldn’t sacrifice is weight. Otherwise it’s just another nightforce, maven, trijicon, bushnell, etc. Figuring out a way to make it 20oz would be the game changer. Otherwise I don’t see the scope doing a ton outside of the faithful.

 

[cuerro viejo]

I would sacrifice Illumination(never use it) then weight

I can always build a rifle lighter if need be. I’ve had two rifle scope flat fail on hunts that took for “weight”. I would use a hole saw on the right stock before I’d give up reliably going forward

 

[B_Reynolds_AK]

Illumination is pointless on this scope, if the reticle is as good as they say.

It needs to weigh No More than the NF NXS 2.5-10. That scope is pretty much ideal, besides for the reticle options.