I shot my first deer on the run at 60 yards with a lever action 1894 Winchester rifle made in 1902. But that was the last time I use a rifle without a scope. In 1977 I bought a 7mm RM so that I could use it for elk. Flat shooting to make up for shaky range estimates. Killed several elk over 300 & some under 60 yards. Equipment has changed the game. With rangefinders scopes that dial or have calibrated reticles 400 is the new 200 & 500 or 600 is the new 300. A 12 year old at the neighboring camp shot his first elk with one shot at 649 yards. His fathers rifle & dialing about 20 minutes to set up the shot. Without wind shooting long range has become almost routine. I’ve got a 500 yard elk rock at my range at home all my CF rifles hit it first try. I can teach a Sharp kid to hit it in a few hours.How the hell did people hunt elk with open sights and the ballistics of a 35 Remington using a Core-Lokt? At times I think we have a lot of shooters and less hunters. Calibers and bullets may have made hunters more efficient but not necessarily better hunters. Seems like a lot of "hunters" are more worried about their equipment than learning to ethically harvest an animal and working on their actual hunting skills. I would guess that 90% of hunters have no business shooting at an elk at 600 yards. I know that I'm not in that 10% that can and I have sent enough rounds down the barrel of a rifle to fund a third world country (I have a shooting problem). Part of ethical hunting is to know when to pull the trigger and when not to. If it's a "maybe" or "I think so" shot, I'm not taking the shot no matter how big it is. I have too much respect for the animal to try to not do everything that I can to efficiently kill that animal as quickly as possible. It sucks really bad when you wound an animal and don't recover them. If it doesn't suck, you're not a hunter.