I try to take care of the talent in my team, no questions asked there, but far too many believe their talents are required for a business to run.....walk away and see if we shut the doors....
How does time off come at a cost to the employee if it’s pto?
Maybe I misunderstood but it seemed you were against the use it or lose it policy?
Sign me up for either one, who’s paying that anyway?If you don't need "talent" why do you hire it? If all the talent left, yeah, doors close...
Pay a guy $50/hr and give them 4 weeks off, or pay them $40/hr and give them 6 weeks off.
Only against a "use it or lose it" policy when they won't let you take it and force you to lose it. That's just plain chicken-shit...
How does a company offer unlimited pto?I've been considering leaving my job, but they really get their hooks in you with PTO. I'm trying to land a job with one of the handful of companies around here that offer unlimited PTO. Hopefully then I can negotiate a couple weeks off every fall.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I've seen it called unlimited, flex pto, work life balance time, etc. Ultimately, you aren't working off a balance of time to be used. You negotiate time off based on having your stuff done and I'm guessing time in role plays a part. The studies companies have done shows employees are happier, take fewer sick days, and use less pto by going to that system. Honestly, having gone from managing a small business to now being in corporate America, I don't think it would work for a small company.How does a company offer unlimited pto?
I need people to work, so we can make money , then I can pay them for the work they have done.
The only scenario I can see this working is having enough people on payroll to account for those not there, be it sick or vacation or don’t want to come that day, and the business still function efficiently. Inflated payroll cost can kill profits of a small business. Or I would think it would most, it would mine.
How does a company offer unlimited pto?
I need people to work, so we can make money , then I can pay them for the work they have done.
The only scenario I can see this working is having enough people on payroll to account for those not there, be it sick or vacation or don’t want to come that day, and the business still function efficiently. Inflated payroll cost can kill profits of a small business. Or I would think it would most, it would mine.
What industry are you in?We get unlimited PTO that we call FTO. Technically, the unspoken max before you have to have a chat with your manager for approval is 25 days. Well, actually 27 as we all just found out a few weeks ago that we actually get 2 “Diversity” days a year on top of the 25.
Some people take off way more than the 25-27 days. At least that’s what I’ve heard. My Buddy (in different department) never asks his boss or logs it. Just tells him and goes. His title is much much higher than mine though and his boss is laid back. My boss likes me to log it, but really wouldn’t care if I didn’t. I think last year I did around 20 days. This year I’ll probably end up doing 23-25 officially. We also get 10-11 holidays. All in all not a bad system.
What industry are you in?
You have to produce more than you earn, simple laws of business. A general rule of thumb is an employee should not take more than 25% of what they bring in, otherwise the business would be healthier without. In my line of work, unless someone is dying, there's absolutely no way I'm paying them to go on a month long vacation unless they have at least produced four times as much as they would earn that month. You have to "earn" everything in life.That's too bad that companies think you have to "earn" time off rather than it being part of your compensation package just like a wage is and you have some time iff on day one.
Been there, done that (not by choice), and will likely do it again, soon...
You have to produce more than you earn, simple laws of business. A general rule of thumb is an employee should not take more than 25% of what they bring in, otherwise the business would be healthier without. In my line of work, unless someone is dying, there's absolutely no way I'm paying them to go on a month long vacation unless they have at least produced four times as much as they would earn that month. You have to "earn" everything in life.
You do realize that the 25% does not only pertain to money, right? You do realize if the business wants top production (performance), it must give out top expenditure (compensation), right? You do realize the business gets it's four times more based on the human capital owned by the employee, right?
Only a fool in business thinks they can get top production for minimal investment, or in layman terms, a "bargain employee". Your formula isn't necessarily true as it also depends on the overall "overhead" or cost to do business against revenue coming in. Not all business models require a 4 to 1 ratio. What determines the output needed is the marginal product of labor and not some "rule of thumb".
The business has to "earn" everything in life as well...
Man you are easily triggered, but still don't shoot straight!! I bet you got yourself a safe space at work where you go when rokslide guys hit a little too close to home huh!You do realize that the 25% does not only pertain to money, right? You do realize if the business wants top production (performance), it must give out top expenditure (compensation), right? You do realize the business gets it's four times more based on the human capital owned by the employee, right?
Only a fool in business thinks they can get top production for minimal investment, or in layman terms, a "bargain employee". Your formula isn't necessarily true as it also depends on the overall "overhead" or cost to do business against revenue coming in. Not all business models require a 4 to 1 ratio. What determines the output needed is the marginal product of labor and not some "rule of thumb".
The business has to "earn" everything in life as well...
Edit: And, the not taking more than 25% isn't the employees problem to worry about, it's the business's. If the business can't figure out how to adequately compensate the employee for their knowledge, experience, and skillset and still only give them 25% of what they produce, then the business needs to re-examine their business model...
He proved himself to the employer the day he was hired, otherwise the employer doesn't know what he's doing. By your logic, an employee will never prove themselves to their employer until they let them take advantage of them. Liberal snowflake? Hardly. I easily get triggered when people like yourself think you have it all figured out when you don't.Man you are easily triggered, but still don't shoot straight!! I bet you got yourself a safe space at work where you go when rokslide guys hit a little too close to home huh!
My post was in reply to the guy who said he deserves a months time off the first damn day on job. That dude hasn't earned any respect yet with said employer. That's all I was replying to. Of course, true to a liberal snowflakes form, you never addressed this in your reply to me.