- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 9,988
All great points. That SG jacket sounds pretty awesome. Im surprised you almost went hypothermic in the Uncompahgre. That definitly hasnt been my experience but I wouldnt call it a furnace either. All of this is pretty subjective to the users body type, metabolism, etc. I think.
The SG jacket is a good jacket. However I’m not saying it’s THE jacket. It’s just the one that has proven to work so far. The Uncompahgre was a combination of things- being wet from sweat, wool base layer, high humidity, and just a tick of wind. However, it has less insulation amount than most summer weight sleeping bags. It therefore can not be as warm as one.... if you are stationary. When used by quite a few people as I described (thin base layer, R1 fleece, no wind, out of the sun), internal temp of the jacket goes below 66-70 degrees somewhere between 40 and 50 degrees for most wearers. That 68* middle ground has shown to be where most are truly comfortable.
The subjectivity is much less about the actual warmth, and way more about dudes trying to be tough and claiming they’re not chilly. Guys have sternly stated they were totally comfortable even though the were lightly rubbing their hands, and had chill bumps when you pulled their sleeve up. When people get chilled in the slightest, that is when they start diverting attention away from the task, and some part of them start thinking about warmth.
Respectfully disagree. I’ll let the OP determine if their rankings and description is helpful. They are intense climbers and mountaineers.
I’m aware of who they are, have experience with using them and their basis for clothing. Have found good things, and have been miserable doing so as well. Nothing they write answers the question above. If it does, and I’ve overlooked it, can you please point it out?
Just like a sleeping bag, I need to know what temp ranges it works in. Active use doesn’t work for relaying information because people have a huge variation in heat production while in motion. They have a lot less variation stationary. So once someone learns what temp rating they need for a certain activity, then they can make informed decisions. In a multi year effort the only way that has shown for this to work is to treat and evaluate clothing like it’s a sleeping bag. Otherwise, the information is like in the thread about “puffys that are actually warm”- all over the map with no real value.
It’s certainly better than the vast majority of individual comments, but the use of general mountaineering, climbing, biking, coffee drinking, skiing, etc does not translate to cold weather stationary activities. True expedition use can, but it still isn’t a direct informant of cold weather, late season glassing.