idig4au
WKR
What s BHA stand on natural resources development?
What s BHA stand on natural resources development?
What s BHA stand on natural resources development?
As you can see from my post I said ... "greendecoys is not a source." I was speaking about greendecoys. Greendecoys is not a source. It is a darkmoney group.
BHA is open and honest about what they do and where they get their funding. greendecoys is not.
Is there any actual information about BHA working in any way at all, ever, for gun control?
Didn't think so.[/QUOTE
Ok you got me, if the leader of your organization raised millions under the guise of Montana Sportsmen for Obama the most anti gun president ever, no reason to question if that organization is anti gun..... Seems very logical. I mean just cause dick Cheney was on the board of Halliburton has nothing to do with invading Iraq.
Ask colorado what happened when these type of politicians were supported, bye bye Magpul and hi cap mags, Montana could be next with BHA supporting those type of politicians. And the president who pushes those policies. I mean who you vote for says a lot about what you believe in.
What s BHA stand on natural resources development?
Ok you got me, if the leader of your organization raised millions under the guise of Montana Sportsmen for Obama the most anti gun president ever, no reason to question if that organization is anti gun..... Seems very logical. I mean just cause dick Cheney was on the board of Halliburton has nothing to do with invading Iraq.
Ask colorado what happened when these type of politicians were supported, bye bye Magpul and hi cap mags, Montana could be next with BHA supporting those type of politicians. And the president who pushes those policies. I mean who you vote for says a lot about what you believe in.
Once again this is fyi only not an attack on anyone's political beliefs. I still might join BHA........
"BHA’s Minnesota chapter opposes the proposed Sandpiper pipeline that would transport 375,000 barrels daily of North Dakota crude oil to Minnesota and Wisconsin refineries. The group also weighed in against the proposed PolyMet copper mine that could bring hundreds of jobs to northern Minnesota’s Iron Range."
http://watchdog.org/203523/sportsmen-group-targeted-green-decoy-environmentalists-fires-back/
Mike21,
At least go back and check your facts. Per the Green Decoy allegations:
He was a member of the
Montana Sportsmen for Obama Committee and headed
the “Montana Hunters and Anglers Leadership Fund”
political action committee (PAC). The PAC spent $1.1
million to oppose Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in
Montana Denny Rehberg and $500,000 on a Libertarian
Party candidate whom observers believe took votes from
Rehberg, helping secure Democrat Jon Tester’s re-election
Ok you got me, if the leader of your organization raised millions under the guise of Montana Sportsmen for Obama the most anti gun president ever, no reason to question if that organization is anti gun
“I’m confident when Sen. Obama becomes president he will protect hunters and anglers right to access their national forests,” Tawney said
http://helenair.com/news/sportsmen-...cle_13c17fba-1318-5bfb-bd6e-4892e6e13e7b.html
Seems like the only person that has made this political is Land Tawney...
Right there. He didn't raise millions for MS for Obama, he was a member. The PAC he headed spent millions against Denny Rehberg.
Bitter Bulls,
The " source" listed was http://watchdog.org/203523/sportsmen-group-targeted-green-decoy-environmentalists-fires-back/, this is not Green Decoys, it even calls the green decoy video "slick". It was written by "Tom Steward covers government waste, spending and policy issues in his home state of Minnesota. Also a documentary filmmaker and in-depth broadcast journalist, Tom's work has appeared on NPR, Animal Planet, WCCO-TV, WGBH-TV, PBS, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, KSTP-TV, CBC, among other outlets. Highlights include the fall of the Berlin Wall, a Peabody Award, the first footage in the wild of the endangered Sumatran tiger and rhino and countless individuals who shared their stories, big and small. Steward served as a communications strategist in the U.S. Senate before returning to reporting on issues and people often overlooked by other media."
"BHA was quoted In the Duluth News Tribune recently, BHA’s Lien again took aim at the Environmental Policy Alliance and “big-industry corporate types looking to fatten their already bursting bank accounts at the expense of everyday, hardworking Americans. Whether you hunt deer in Minnesota’s Superior National Forest or elk in Colorado’s San Juan National Forest, the effort by fringe politicians and special interests to transfer or sell public lands that you depend on to hunt, fish and recreate — robbing us of our American birthright — should be a concern.”
Sounds like a source to me..... Correct?
Oh you mean the exact amount of money that montana sportsmen for Obama raised, really?
“There’s a lot of talk about Obama and guns, and — I’ll be honest with you — a lot of fear,” said Tawney. “But at least he’s not trying to fake it. Not like John Kerry with a dead goose over his shoulder and new hunting outfit one month before the election.”
The biggest misperception of people in Montana, he said, is that everyone is a rube just off the hay truck. That’s not to say there aren’t militia wackos hiding in the hills, trading toxic nonsense about Obama’s secret Muslim past." http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/opinion/16egan.html?_r=1&
Tawney didn't do shit is what someone said. Tawney says "at least Obama is not trying to act like he is pro gun and Tawney supported him.Now fake hunter john Kerry (Tawneys words) is sec of state.
"BHA’s Minnesota chapter opposes the proposed Sandpiper pipeline that would transport 375,000 barrels daily of North Dakota crude oil to Minnesota and Wisconsin refineries. The group also weighed in against the proposed PolyMet copper mine that could bring hundreds of jobs to northern Minnesota’s Iron Range."
http://watchdog.org/203523/sportsmen-group-targeted-green-decoy-environmentalists-fires-back/
As you can see from my post I said ... "greendecoys is not a source." I was speaking about greendecoys. Greendecoys is not a source. It is a darkmoney group.
BHA is open and honest about what they do and where they get their funding. greendecoys is not.
Is there any actual information about BHA working in any way at all, ever, for gun control?
Didn't think so.