Considering outfitting - Here is why I have a problem with it. Let's say I want to pay you to go scout for me in region G.... is that legal? And why or why not?I agree with your thoughts on grazing. I outfitted where my neighbor had a grazing permit for his cattle. That I can live with. But the problem was no enforcement of the regulations. Too many cattle out there and not removing them by the required date. They get around that by the allowance of stragglers. That number is 10% of the number they are permitted to have on national forest. But there’s no way to verify or document how many are still out there. The result was over grazing. But it’s a century old problem in what was originally a ranch based community and you will NEVER change it.
I had every bale of hay that took weeks to pack in for the season eaten in a half day by stragglers. Way more stragglers than there should be. I called the forest service and their reply is always the same like it’s a recording: He’s not breaking any rules you guys need to get along.
As far as outfitters it’s always interesting to me to see how people with an opinions they strongly believe in don’t take a minute to look at things from other perspectives. Yes an outfitter profits from operating on public land. But he was asked to do so by someone from the public who wants to enjoy the land just like everyone else but they don’t have the way and means to do it without assistance. This is also something that has gone on for a hundred years. What makes you say it no longer has a place? The hunter has to draw the license. Wyoming has no outfitter set aside licenses. Should diy hunters like us have preference when it comes to land use?
What about the other businesses doing business on public land? Fishing guides, horse rides, tour guides, rock climbing guides and mountain bike tours? Or don’t they matter because they aren’t competing for the same resources?
Outfitters don’t bother me. Yes they eliminate a drainage or 2 from my options. But they are easy to work around. My perspective when I see a guide pull up to my trailhead and unload 4 horses and 2 city slickers is that I feel sorry for him. Elk hunting is tough enough without having a ball and chain or two around your ankle. The guide might be tough but he’s limited by the abilities of his hunter. His out of shape unacclimated hunter.
I draw the line at special consideration known here as outfitter welfare. That’s when politics get involved with hunting. Having outfitter sponsored licenses, allowing outfitters to utilize landowner tags, and the bullshit wilderness restriction are not fair. I’m into equal opportunity when it comes to licensing and public land access. As long as an outfitter and his hunters are on the same playing field as me I can live with them. A guided hunter is no different to me than any other hunter. Same goes with ranchers. The rules are the rules. Their rules are different but I have to accept that. Most of them don’t hunt. I like that!
That said… don’t let Rob Wiley fool you. He speaks up for mule deer because it benefits him. If he was guiding trophy opossum hunts he’d be a spokesman for opossums and wouldn’t give a shit about the deer. He probably exploits the deer more than anyone. He’s not winning any popularity contests in the Star Valley.
Let's say Im an outfitter and I find a big deer in July and I decide to pay young "guides" to sit on that deer until my client gets there for the opener? Is that legal? Is it fair chase? Is it good for the ecosystem and the betterment of hunting? Is it a level playing field for all the other hunters that have been scouting and can't sit on a deer because they aren't outfitters and can't pay guides to sit on it?
Outfitters are king in Wyoming and it has gone way too far. They are exploiting a natural resource as a whole. And I believe there are still some good players out there but they are few and far between.