Well, given your experience this year, maybe when there's a situation when you "can't get closer" that's a sign that you oughtta let the critter walk then, right? Surely you can agree that would've been a better end result than the potential, or in this particular case, the reality, that the animal suffers unnecessarily, right? For the record, I haven't seen anyone here say that only inside 100 yards is ethical.If people think only 100 yard shots are ethical well then they can do that, but there are plenty of situations in the west where you can’t get closer and thats a fact!
I don't think anyone here is bashing anyone. I see nothing more than constructive criticism that I personally feel is well deserved. I see no one here bashing you as a person. Based on your subsequent posts after the original, you didn't have a great hit. If the deer is still alive, that much is obvious. You're adamant that the distance simply could not have contributed to the situation because, and I quote "You shoot a lot".....Ok, great. One of the great things about this country(or this forum) is that you have the freedom to take what others are advising of you, plenty of whom may have more or varying experience, wisdom, etc., and throw it in the can and ignore it. That seems to be what you're intent on doing. If that's what you want to do, then so be it. Although, if that was your intention, I can't help but question why you even made the thread in the first place? Regardless, I hope that a tale like this deer is something that you don't experience again anytime soon.The point of this whole forum is to talk hunting and make others better hunters/shooters, not bashing and shit talking. Just saying
