Speaking specifically about pistols, but I guess any firearm is relevant ...
I still don't know if I buy the whole penetration is paramount thing. I can't imagine that a hollow point would have trouble penetrating to the brain cavity of anything in North America.
Poking skinny holes through something doesn't seem too lethal to me, unless your sub half inch projectile hits something major.
Although it doesn't go as deep, I would imagine a hollow point partially exploding, while still having sufficient mass to get some penetration, would have a better chance of hitting the spine or debilitating the central nervous system.
Using something that doesn't expand is almost like stabbing the animal with a thin knife.
I wouldn't use a non expanding bullet for hunting, because I don't think it does as much damage and kills as fast.
Archery kills by hemorrhaging and typically rifles by blowing up internal tissue and hydrostatic shock.
I shot an elk in the head two times at 10 yards this year with a 300 win mag and 215 grain berger and it just looked at me with eyes as big as saucers. At least one bullet exited. I don't recall seeing a second exit, but I also didn't look too hard. Don't know what that means exactly, but you think a 300 win to the head twice would take down just about anything.
Just some random thoughts I'm struggling with. I could be convinced otherwise.
Thoughts?
I still don't know if I buy the whole penetration is paramount thing. I can't imagine that a hollow point would have trouble penetrating to the brain cavity of anything in North America.
Poking skinny holes through something doesn't seem too lethal to me, unless your sub half inch projectile hits something major.
Although it doesn't go as deep, I would imagine a hollow point partially exploding, while still having sufficient mass to get some penetration, would have a better chance of hitting the spine or debilitating the central nervous system.
Using something that doesn't expand is almost like stabbing the animal with a thin knife.
I wouldn't use a non expanding bullet for hunting, because I don't think it does as much damage and kills as fast.
Archery kills by hemorrhaging and typically rifles by blowing up internal tissue and hydrostatic shock.
I shot an elk in the head two times at 10 yards this year with a 300 win mag and 215 grain berger and it just looked at me with eyes as big as saucers. At least one bullet exited. I don't recall seeing a second exit, but I also didn't look too hard. Don't know what that means exactly, but you think a 300 win to the head twice would take down just about anything.
Just some random thoughts I'm struggling with. I could be convinced otherwise.
Thoughts?