crispi boot advice needed

[nardoj]

Hey everyone,

So I've started my archery journey about a year ago and now feel comfortable enough to start working on my backcountry hiking training for my first hunt next year. I have buddies in both Utah and Oregon that will take me Elk hunting next year and so I've been hiking a lot here in Southern California in preparation. I've gotten to the point where my Merrells just aren't cutting it as I'm hiking with weighted packs and would like to get my first hunting boot, I've seen great things about Crispis and figured I would give them a shot.
These would primarily be a warm weather / early season hiking boot ( our winters drop to 50 degrees, freezing I know) but when I go out to Oregon or Utah next year I would like it to be able to handle the occasional mini-storm. I've pretty much read all the reviews possible and have come to a short list of the uninsulated Wyomings, Summits, and Valdres.
I'm 5'10 260lbs, I've never had ankle issues but I do value the support since I'm a bigger guy, so the abss and wrapped frame like the wyomings have, seem to be the top choice. But since I'll be primarily hiking in preparation for the next year the versatility and breath ability of the summits or valdres has me intrigued as well.

I've hit a point of paralysis by analysis, the nearest place that has them is about 5 hours away so any firsthand experience is much appreciated.

Thanks, Jordan

 

[Kotaman]

Can’t go wrong with any of those. I would add Thor’s to the list to really confuse the issue! The Wyoming’s are probably the most



versatile of the bunch if you ever “expand your appetite” to more extreme hunts.

 

[mj23polaris]

Love my Wyoming's, fit great, perfect balance between support and flex, dry fast, great for 30°+ weather, nice and light, the grip is awesome I can walk with confidence across wet rocks in a river or on steep and stupid stuff in a boulder field at 11k.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

 

[nardoj]

awesome just what I wanted to hear, what is the hottest that you have worn them in? Any issues with them running warm?

 

[hoff1ck]

I was in a similar boat. Had it narrowed down to the Wyoming, Idaho or Summit. Ended up eliminating the Summit due to the EVA midsole. I know a lot of guys love the Summit, but it just didn't seem to fit with my needs. I actually spoke to a couple guys at Black Ovis that recommended I check out the Nevada as well. I'm in Michigan, so trying them on beforehand isn't even remotely an option. I ended up ordering both the Wyoming and Nevada from them with the intention of sending one back. Going into that, I'd say I was about 90% sure I'd end up with the Wyoming but I wanted to give the Nevada a fair shake. I'm so glad I did, because the Wyoming didn't even compare to the Nevada in fit or comfort for me out of the box. The Wyoming also seems like a great boot, but the Nevada was a much better option for me. I'd definitely recommend trying a couple if you can and then deciding. I think that route likely saved me some hassle vs just going with the Wyoming based off of my research.

 

[Kotaman]

I was in a similar boat. Had it narrowed down to the Wyoming, Idaho or Summit. Ended up eliminating the Summit due to the EVA midsole. I know a lot of guys love the Summit, but it just didn't seem to fit with my needs. I actually spoke to a couple guys at Black Ovis that recommended I check out the Nevada as well. I'm in Michigan, so trying them on beforehand isn't even remotely an option. I ended up ordering both the Wyoming and Nevada from them with the intention of sending one back. Going into that, I'd say I was about 90% sure I'd end up with the Wyoming but I wanted to give the Nevada a fair shake. I'm so glad I did, because the Wyoming didn't even compare to the Nevada in fit or comfort for me out of the box. The Wyoming also seems like a great boot, but the Nevada was a much better option for me. I'd definitely recommend trying a couple if you can and then deciding. I think that route likely saved me some hassle vs just going with the Wyoming based off of my research.

Good points here. I will add that my favorite Crispi boot is also the Nevada.

 

[Oldirtdog]

I tried the Summit and Valdres and settled on the Valdres and couldn't be happier. I primarily went with these two based on my use cases and overall weight. The Summit have a narrow and less spacious toe box that just didn't work for my foot. The Valdres fit great and are about the same weight as the Summit with a nubuk upper and poly sole (lightest option in the Crispi lineup with those features IIRC). I found the Valdres to be true to size (I wear a 13 running shoe and a 13 Valdres fit perfect). They have been 100% waterproof through all the rain/creeks/mud here in GA, are very supportive without being too stiff (with 60lb training loads in my SG pack), and have been tolerable/performed well enough in the Arizona heat. Don't forget to use the Rokslide discount from Black Ovis when you make a decision!

 

[roadrunner]

I looked at the same ones you are, non-insulated. Then I asked myself: if I get a non-insulated boot a 1/2 size larger and wear extra wool socks, how is that any different than going with a pair that have 200 gm insulation?

So I looked into the Briksdal's (a few write ups on them here on RS) and ordered a pair, 1/2 size larger because that boot does not have a wide width option. The 1/2 up didn't bend right in the toe, a potential for an uncomfortable pinch point.

A week later while on a trip up to SLC, I swung by Scheels (since that's who I ordered them through) to 1) try on a couple of different models, and 2) exchange for my true size if that was the choice made. I exchanged for my true size and haven't looked back. Didn't care for the other models I tried on. Arch and ankle support were the primary reasons.

The true size fits snug enough but not too tight as to pinch, allowing for one pair of regular socks to be worn with comfort and no hotspots.

 

[Montanaelk31]

I own Valdres and Summits. I think if you want a full grain leather boot, go with the valdrez. If your a synthetic guy summits. I like both of mine. No preference. Pretty much same boot. Summits seem a little warmer.

 

[nardoj]

I was in a similar boat. Had it narrowed down to the Wyoming, Idaho or Summit. Ended up eliminating the Summit due to the EVA midsole. I know a lot of guys love the Summit, but it just didn't seem to fit with my needs. I actually spoke to a couple guys at Black Ovis that recommended I check out the Nevada as well. I'm in Michigan, so trying them on beforehand isn't even remotely an option. I ended up ordering both the Wyoming and Nevada from them with the intention of sending one back. Going into that, I'd say I was about 90% sure I'd end up with the Wyoming but I wanted to give the Nevada a fair shake. I'm so glad I did, because the Wyoming didn't even compare to the Nevada in fit or comfort for me out of the box. The Wyoming also seems like a great boot, but the Nevada was a much better option for me. I'd definitely recommend trying a couple if you can and then deciding. I think that route likely saved me some hassle vs just going with the Wyoming based off of my research.

So in the back of my mind the Nevada has been sitting there as a lot of people tout them as the best overall boot. The nearest place is maybe 5 hours away so I can't really try them on. But my main concern is the breathability which for me right now is probably the biggest factor, as mentioned my hunt isn't until next year so these are going to be my warm weather hiking/ training boots in the meantime.

 

[Leo45]

I talked to Kendal at Crispi today
I am debating betweem the uninsulated Nevada and the Wyoming.
Both would work for 90% of my needs.
Obviously Nevada is leather and better longevity and protection. The Wyoming being synthetic obviously breaths better.
He said for an all season boot that the Nevada had less short coming using in the early season than the Wyoming has short comings in the later season.
Think I’m going Nevada
If you are looking exclusively an early season boot there are better choices, I am not

 

[hoff1ck]

I talked to Kendal at Crispi today
I am debating betweem the uninsulated Nevada and the Wyoming.
Both would work for 90% of my needs.
Obviously Nevada is leather and better longevity and protection. The Wyoming being synthetic obviously breaths better.
He said for an all season boot that the Nevada had less short coming using in the early season than the Wyoming has short comings in the later season.
Think I’m going Nevada
If you are looking exclusively an early season boot there are better choices, I am not

I think you’re likely making a good choice. Breathability was a concern of mine with the leather. Honestly though, these aren’t quite like your typical leather boot either. I’ve only tested them sparingly so far, but I have no issues with overheating and my feet tend to run hot. Both the Wyoming and Nevada will likely fit the bill for early season, so I wouldn’t necessarily let that scare you. As far as the OP, returns to BO can be made within 30 days so long as you keep the tags on and only try them inside. I think it cost me around 16 bucks to ship them back FedEx, so something to keep in mind if you still end up torn between the two.

 

[303TrophyHusband]

I talked to Kendal at Crispi today
I am debating betweem the uninsulated Nevada and the Wyoming.
Both would work for 90% of my needs.
Obviously Nevada is leather and better longevity and protection. The Wyoming being synthetic obviously breaths better.
He said for an all season boot that the Nevada had less short coming using in the early season than the Wyoming has short comings in the later season.
Think I’m going Nevada
If you are looking exclusively an early season boot there are better choices, I am not

Good advice, unless you're going to buy multiple pairs of boots, go with something that'll be a good boot for all seasons. We all know how the weather can change like a gust of wind during elk season. I run a couple pairs of boots over the course of the seasons but I'm finding more and more my Nevadas are my go-to, just in case.