Crazy Creek 2.0 original vs Longback (is the Longback worth the weight?)

[RSC12]

I just got back from a 8 day sheep hunt in Northern BC and looking for opinions on these 2 chairs. I'll state that I do have some lower back issues which is leading me to now want a chair with back support. On this last hunt I just took my regular old Thermarest Z pad cut down and tried leaning against my pack/rock etc but found that after an hour or 2 behind glass my lower back was taking a beating and it would really distract from my ability to glass effectively.

I think the Crazy Creek chair would meet my needs as I want something that goes directly on the ground but offers support. I've read all the forum responses I can and it seems that lots really like the chair. I'll also state that I have a Helinox chair but find it difficult to use on uneven or soft ground.

The biggest question I have for anyone that uses one is whether the long back version is worth the extra weight and pack size. I am 6'2" which they say should use the long back version however it is an extra 3.2oz and and additional 5.5inches longer to pack. I think I would prefer the smaller chair but thought I'd ask for advice.

HEX 2.0 Original Chair

HEX 2.0 Original Chair Our most packable & lightweight chair – the Original size rolls up to only a 4 inch diameter! Ideal whenever space and weight are a factor. Also perfect for day hikes – just clip the HEX 2.0 to your pack and go! 3 Sizes available: Original, LongBack & PowerLounger HEX 2.0...

crazycreek.com

HEX 2.0 LongBack Chair

HEX 2.0 LongBack Chair - Its taller and wider! Check Chart Below- The HEX 2.0 LongBack chairs are highly packable and great for ultra-light camping. Ideal whenever space and weight are a factor. Also perfect for day hikes – just clip the HEX 2.0 to your pack and go! HEX 2.0 chairs roll-up...

crazycreek.com

Regular Size Specs

• Seat Height: 16.5 IN / 42 CM
• Seat Width: 15 IN / 38 CM
• Seat Depth: 16.5 IN / 42 CM
• Weight: 20 oz / 567 g
• Capacity: 250 Lbs / 113.4 kg

Longback Size Specs

• Seat Height: 22 IN / 56 CM
• Seat Width: 18 IN / 46 CM
• Seat Depth: 16.5 IN / 42 CM
• Weight: 23.2 oz / 658 g
• Capacity: 250 Lbs / 113.4 kg

Thanks for any opinions,
RSC

 

[RSC12]

bump

 

[Wacko]

I went a slightly different route. I use the CC power lounger. I did it for a couple reasons...first I can deploy it like the regular CC but it will have twice the pad under my butt. Second it can double as ground protection for my sleep pad.

It is heavier than those 2. If it were me I would go for the minimal weight penalty, extra room, and the slightly more versatility the long back offers.

Yes they are worth the weight. You can sit anywhere and have back support. They also block a little wind. I have used mine to shield my stove on occasion as well.

YMMV...

 

[NealS02]

I have the original and love it. Unfortunately, I do not have experience with the long back. With minimal extra weight it might be worthwhile. Order an original, try it out with tags on, and if not big enough just exchange for the long back.

 

[BLJ]

I went a slightly different route. I use the CC power lounger. I did it for a couple reasons...first I can deploy it like the regular CC but it will have twice the pad under my butt. Second it can double as ground protection for my sleep pad.

It is heavier than those 2. If it were me I would go for the minimal weight penalty, extra room, and the slightly more versatility the long back offers.

Yes they are worth the weight. You can sit anywhere and have back support. They also block a little wind. I have used mine to shield my stove on occasion as well.

YMMV...

I’ve been looking at this model recently for the same reasons.
Serving as a seat and adding some R value to the sleep system really helps justify the weight for me.

 

[Poser]

I don't have the longback, but generally find the regular to be sufficiently comfortable in the backcountry. When I'm around camp, I'll add an inflatable pillow to the lower lumbar region and that ups the comfort level quite a bit.

I will say, however, when I take the Crazy Creek to my GF's softball games to use as a bleacher seat, I absolutely wish I had the tall version as its just not near enough support to stay comfortable and only a little better than not having a seat at all on the bleachers. Could be that bleacher sitting is inherently more upright or could merely be perspective. If you are going to have the chair pull double duty for bleachers, go with the long version.

 

[htlt_surfboards]

I have the hex original and came to it from a z rest cut down. It is hands down a million times better and improved my overall camping and hunting comfort maybe more than any one piece of gear I have upgraded. That being said I’m 6’0 and if I were to have to replace it I would get the long back. I think you could get away with the regular but at 6’2 I think you will appreciate where the top of the long back hits your back vs the regular.

 

[Dryfly1]

Have an original (Camo Material) long back that i use for turkey hunting. I think you will love it for the support. Mine is at least 25 years old and is almost worn out

2GBL

 

[RSC12]

Thanks for the replys. I think I'll just bite the bullet and go for the longback. On those bigger hunts I definitely try to be mindful of weights and sizes but I've also cut from other areas so it makes it a little easier to justify. I just really noticed my back would get so aggravated that it would distract from my glassing so hopefully this helps with that.

Thanks RSC