CPW SAR Increase

There's different ways to look at it. Of note: The previous BSAR fee was set at 25 cents and has not changed since 1987.

I buy a fishing license + another 4-5 big game licenses annually. Definitely pay my share, but even then, we're talking, what? $7 annually to support S and R. I'm not sure there is a practical way to obtain funding from other user groups since there are no licenses involved with the exception of SWA permits. The state can't charge mtn bikers a licenses fee to ride on FS/BLM land. Unsure how you would develop a system when there is no existing systematic framework. Developing a system of collection would eat more into the budget that goes to S and R.

I don't conclude that there is enough there to complain about. The quality of of S and R throughout Colorado is impressively high. The volunteers that are into it are WAY into it, many of them having quite a bit of their own money wrapped up in participating in S and R + you get fire departments, county EMTS and even aircraft with extensive training in high angle rescue, avalanche rescue, swift water rescue etc. From what I've seen, I've been very impressed.
 
There's different ways to look at it. Of note: The previous BSAR fee was set at 25 cents and has not changed since 1987.

I buy a fishing license + another 4-5 big game licenses annually. Definitely pay my share, but even then, we're talking, what? $7 annually to support S and R. I'm not sure there is a practical way to obtain funding from other user groups since there are no licenses involved with the exception of SWA permits. The state can't charge mtn bikers a licenses fee to ride on FS/BLM land. Unsure how you would develop a system when there is no existing systematic framework. Developing a system of collection would eat more into the budget that goes to S and R.

I don't conclude that there is enough there to complain about. The quality of of S and R throughout Colorado is impressively high. The volunteers that are into it are WAY into it, many of them having quite a bit of their own money wrapped up in participating in S and R + you get fire departments, county EMTS and even aircraft with extensive training in high angle rescue, avalanche rescue, swift water rescue etc. From what I've seen, I've been very impressed.
Why can't the state charge MTB on federal land?
 
You have a lot to say about a $1 extra fee on license?

Bummer. I guess you'll just have to abstain in protest.
I think you are missing the forest in the trees. No one else is paying for SAR in CO yet our trails and Backcountry are swarmed by hikers, mountain bikers skiers etc. The onus is on us to fund them yet we are a much smaller user group.
 
I think you are missing the forest in the trees. No one else is paying for SAR in CO yet our trails and Backcountry are swarmed by hikers, mountain bikers skiers etc. The onus is on us to fund them yet we are a much smaller user group.

I'm not missing anything. They could make it $10, I don't care. Just like I don't care if hikers and mountain bikers pay it or not.

Yea we pay s&r. If it costs me $1 to know that someone is coming to help if I, or someone else, needs it. No problem here.
 
I think you are missing the forest in the trees. No one else is paying for SAR in CO yet our trails and Backcountry are swarmed by hikers, mountain bikers skiers etc. The onus is on us to fund them yet we are a much smaller user group.
Hunters are the only people who have to have a license, which gives an easy place to tack a fee.

I'd be 1000% fine with charging fees for hikers. I'd also be fine if the state raised tag fees and if USFS and BLM charged access fees for consumptive uses. Or non-consumptive for that matter. Raise all the fees. :)

But I'm also fine with SAR fees. I'm more than fine with it. I'd happily make it $50 per year.
 
I’d like to know if all the climbers that get rescued have purchased a license, any license that contributes to SAR

I couldnt find much except this but I'd be interested in some hard stats.

From prior research, the people using SAR are not the people paying for SAR. Which is the main gripe here and people can't seem to understand it's not about the total cost but the implications.
 
Way to over blow it. $400%. Trying to just get a reaction or something?

It is an increase of $1. And hasn’t changed in almost 40 years. Reel yourself in.
Yep, that's what the OP says. Thanks for clarifying even though OP stated going from 0.25 to 1.25...which is 400%. Thats how math works regardless of the absolute value.
 
I'll complain once it hits $35+. Until then, a dollar for saving my dumb-ass from some got-myself-in-trouble? That's a whole lot less than all the bourbon bottles I'm going to have to buy for everyone that came out to save my butt...
 

I couldnt find much except this but I'd be interested in some hard stats.

From prior research, the people using SAR are not the people paying for SAR. Which is the main gripe here and people can't seem to understand it's not about the total cost but the implications.
You do you. I'm fine spending a buck to save the next Donny Dumbass who gets ledged-out on Torrey's. If this outrages you, wait until you learn about how tariffs actually work.
 
I'll complain once it hits $35+. Until then, a dollar for saving my dumb-ass from some got-myself-in-trouble? That's a whole lot less than all the bourbon bottles I'm going to have to buy for everyone that came out to save my butt...
Once again, I don't care about the increase on the tag and even that is a low amount IMO and was needed. I already donate to the local SAR significantly. Commission voted to increase fees on the low hanging fruit. Others need to pay their fair share.

It's the fact our user group gets shafted to pay for everyone elses experiences in this outdoor recreation state. Seemingly for the amount of times SAR gets deployed to help some climber, rafter or 14 summiter you'd think a better system would be in place.
 
Back
Top