wapitibob
WKR
OTC for residents, draw for all NR.
Not trolling, honestly curious why would you want PPs ?????????They should go every unit and season draw and require min 3 PP (regardless of residency to have a name in the hat just like sheep/moose/goat).
They should go 80/20 on residency tag break down and any tag left over should be available OTC but at NR price.
To reduce the number of people sitting on points?Not trolling, honestly curious why would you want PPs ?????????
Let me rephrase, just make it min 2-3 pt apply to draw. If every one wants less pressure, make it where you can only hunt every two-three years per species unless you can find Left over tags. Make all Left over tag NR price to help alleviate the funding losses of eliminating OTC.Not trolling, honestly curious why would you want PPs ?????????
I somewhat agree, but I think in this hypothetical plan I'd like to see OTC tags be limited to DAUs rather than statewide. I'd also like to see those take a preference point.As a NR, I feel a reasonable step would be to go all draw for NR before going all draw for everyone. They can use that as a template to go all draw for everyone if just limiting NR doesn't move the needle enough.
history... for whatever that is worth.... they (CPW) usually have super high tag allocations for the units they convert from OTC to a point unit, and then after a couple years of data on how many people want to hunt it / points spent on it / they adjust the tag allocationsGoing to a draw does not necessarily reduce crowding if the allocation of tags in a unit is unreasonably high. A Colorado unit I used to hunt went from OTC to draw recently and apparently it was still a Wal Mart parking lot at the trailheads because they gave so many tags in the drawing. A draw does give the commission the ability to limit tags but will they?
But, but, think of the influencers! How will they (pretend to) make a living without producing “DIY, public land, OTC” content while building points?
I recently said the sameI would love to see Colorado go all draw. Then again, after 2018 I swore I would never hunt an OTC tag in Colorado ever again...
Hopefully it's because overcrowding during hunting seasons and Elk population management are important enough issues to warrant action being taken by the Commission sooner than later.Any idea as to why the commissioner wants this to be addressed before the 5 year Big game structure?
This is what will happen. Nebraska had been getting crowding complaints and so they capped the NR tags but used the previous seasons tag sales for that cap number. CPW is likely going to sell the same number of tags in the end.history... for whatever that is worth.... they (CPW) usually have super high tag allocations for the units they convert from OTC to a point unit, and then after a couple years of data on how many people want to hunt it / points spent on it / they adjust the tag allocations
There are plenty of units that aren't worth 3pp. Most of the OTC units aren't even worth 1 pp.They should go every unit and season draw and require min 3 PP (regardless of residency to have a name in the hat just like sheep/moose/goat).
They should go 80/20 on residency tag break down and any tag left over should be available OTC but at NR price.