Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about WY. Residents get three choices plus OTC.Correct me if I’m wrong but you don’t get a preference point in Arizona if you draw your second choice…
No preference points in NM so not exactly apples to apples.
Residents don't have points in wyoming.How about WY. Residents get three choices plus OTC.
Whatever is left is available to NR in the leftover draw. But it's mostly less desirable cow tags, 5 point or less tags and some bow tags.
+1Residents don't have points in wyoming.
Colorado letting people get a tag without using points is the true problem the system is getting overwhelmed.
Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
What about points makes it okay to give NR 60%-75% of the tags in a unit?Residents don't have points in wyoming.
Colorado letting people get a tag without using points is the true problem the system is getting overwhelmed.
Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
I’m suspicious those guys are undead or zombies or something.Because they put in for preference points every year. Preference point code is a first choice code so shows on the first page of total applicants.
View attachment 1074851
Arizona looks at your first two choices, but if you draw you lose your points.How about WY. Residents get three choices plus OTC.
Whatever is left is available to NR in the leftover draw. But it's mostly less desirable cow tags, 5 point or less tags and some bow tags.
Wyoming takes care of their R residents the best it seems, but so should every state reallyArizona looks at your first two choices, but if you draw you lose your points.
Wyoming residents don’t have points. Do you want Colorado residents to go fully random, no points?
Two separate issues really.
If you draw you draw a primary choice (be 1st choice or first 2-3) you should lose points and not gain one.
Second is the resident /non-resident split. As a NR, we just have to play by whatever your state decides and as long as it’s clear and spelled out I’m ok.
If I was a resident I’d want to have my cake and eat it too. Wyoming seems to have that down. Apply for LE tags in random and if you don’t draw, go buy a tag the rest of us save and fight over for $50 at Walmart…
Sure, but these animals should not be treated as pure money makers otherwise why not just double or triple the cost of tags along that line of thought? Heck don’t have to sell many tags if a NR tag costs 3000 bucksHere's how I see it...If you were running a business would you rather sell 1 unit of goods for $845 or $70?
Second Change: Allocation rules apply to the first and second choices in the Primary Draw. If there is insufficient resident demand after going through the first and second choices, any excess quota may go to nonresidents (soft cap).
Notice the wording: "after going through the first and second choices"
Well, then reduce the total number of tags. Then residents will still get the same amount of tags they are currently getting and NR much less. The department giving out a shit load of tags in some units is guaranteeing NR get alot % wise.Co gives out more tags than all other western states combined (elk) and it’s becoming evident that it seems unsustainable and yet Co R’s are always the bad guys when ever suggesting that maybe we scale back a touch…
I agree, tough when the commission is being ran by actual nincompoops but that’s a whole other issueWell, then reduce the total number of tags. Then residents will still get the same amount of tags they are currently getting and NR much less. The department giving out a shit load of tags in some units is guaranteeing NR get alot % wise.
I think that is THE ISSUE, not another one.I agree, tough when the commission is being ran by actual nincompoops but that’s a whole other issue
Sure, but these animals should not be treated as pure money makers otherwise why not just double or triple the cost of tags along that line of thought? Heck don’t have to sell many tags if a NR tag costs 3000 bucks
I mean yes they could price us all out of hunting if they wanted R and NR alike…Hnthrdr, I didn’t take bz’s post as an “ought” claim. Could be wrong, but just took it as reality. You make a good point though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Managing wildlife as a public trust resource is definetly not the same as running a for-profit business but your point is still valid. I think this is why a lot of western game commissions struggle. The want to appease the residents because that is their job and who they are supposed to represent but they also want to maximize Non Resident dollars (without ever saying that part out loud).Here's how I see it...If you were running a business would you rather sell 1 unit of goods for $845 or $70?
CO is still more generous with NR tags than any other western state so I guess it is all just relative.
Don't compare OTC to limited.
Harvest rates are likely skewed by NR going guided.
Are any tags that don't require a guide unlimited?NO, its not more generous than Alaska which has NO cap to Non-Resident tags. An in case you forgot geography Alaska is more western than Colorado
Even for the Alaska limited draw tags there are essentially no limits to Non-Residents on most hunts. There are a few hunts with a quota for guided non-residents but those quotas are very liberal (outfitter welfare bias). And if you are a NR with a family member to hunt with pretty much get resident draw odds.