- Thread Starter
- #21
TXCO
WKR
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
- Messages
- 866
Again its a 2 part issue, what does BHA gain by restricting access to NRs (it seems very offbase from the mission) but more importantly what do we as a hunting community gain by further restricting access to able and willing hunters? I pray that FWS does not manage the wildlife of the country but its pretty reasonable thought over time. Just look at wolves and grizzlies or polar bear importation and how thats all played out. The more we restrict access to the vast majority of people, the harder it will be to win the big fight on the national/federal level.
As far as paying the state taxes and having the rights to the animals, I dont fully agree because personal state income taxes can be deducted from federal income taxes reducing the overall federal pot. So someone in Florida can be paying more for the BLM and National Forrest. Also, Wyoming doesnt have personal income taxes.
As far as paying the state taxes and having the rights to the animals, I dont fully agree because personal state income taxes can be deducted from federal income taxes reducing the overall federal pot. So someone in Florida can be paying more for the BLM and National Forrest. Also, Wyoming doesnt have personal income taxes.