Good on you if you have an actual "conversation" with a democrat because that means you would be listening to them. To suggest that dems are the only single issue, ignorant, emotion-based voters is laughable. See the topic the mod waved the yellow flag on above as an example. Republicans literally invented the single issue voter.
Another way of saying hard times make strong people, strong people make good times, good times make soft people and soft people make hard times...
YEP your correct, let those children of god fix ther own country, and not mess mine up.
I guess putting country before faith is one way to go.
Believe what you want but Trumps endorsement is possibly the most valuable currency in the history of elections.
174-9 yesterday.
I am not a “fringe” voter or “extremist” and I would vote for him again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Like what could be accomplished, having the opportunity to vote and voice your opinion since Election Day isn't a national holiday and people have to work? So giving them the opportunity to vote via other means than getting off work early, or taking the day off entirely standing in line for hours is somehow some big conspiracy and a bad thing? You're basically saying that everyone having the right to vote hurts Republicans. In other words, democracy hurts Republicans.
Talked to a buddy the other day that, in a former life, did some consulting for the state of New Jersey. The folks he worked with were career administrators and jokingly referred to themselves as the "weebee's". He asked them what it stood for, and the said "we be here before they are elected and we be here after they are gone".
Yes, although those numbers probably dont tell the whole story. Overall this year he has endorsed over 300 people. He has also endorsed many people that won unopposed. There is no way to say that his endorsement caused the win. So many people are party voters it wouldn't matter who endorsed them.
100% spot on. IMO if some republicans hadn't tripped over themselves in their zeal to enact abortion restrictions, and rather had waited until after the mid-terms, yesterday would have played out much more favorably for the party. There are lots of single-issue voters on both sides of the aisle, and for many women - on both sides of the aisle - abortion is that one issue.
You do know they will only issue absentee ballots to democrats, right? ;-)
I have no problems with absentee ballots, as a veteran who served overseas this was great. My three big issues with mail in ballots are that 1) they are mailed out a month(s) in advance and they asked you to return them asap, even before debates happen. I wonder if folks that saw Fetterman debates, who had already mailed in their ballots had a little concern from his responses, or lack thereof. 2) States that do mail in ballots to all residents even if not requested. This makes the voter responsible for the ballot even if they intend to vote in person. 3) state election officials expecting low voter turnout because mail in ballots # were high. This happened in multiple states, there were ballot and voting machine shortages, and made people wait for hours becasue of issues. Bill Galvin, the Mass secretary of state, said on the news yesterday morning that voter turnout was expected to be low, but it was the complete opposite, leading to ballot shortages and longer waits. Why even say that?
In Oregon, my deceased grandparents each received a ballot in the mail two years ago. One of my grandparents passed in '19, the other in '15. I'll have to call my dad to see if they received one for yesterday's election.
.
