Fram cans LOL.Man, around here everyone just calls them oil filters.
Fram cans LOL.Man, around here everyone just calls them oil filters.
I have no clue and have no opinion on what they "should" be called... I just know my buddies in the UK specifically have always used "supressors" on their guns and have always called them "moderators".I was under the odd impression that "moderators" was the term for ones that suppress the shot but not below 140db.
Fram cans LOL.
I'm still lauging good one! That's what my good friend from Lou see anna calls them.Well, they actually pronounced "Earl Filta"
That rubbery crap fram uses melts off.
It was just some dork who sat directly to my left at the range when there were 3 other open benches farther away or to my other side. He clearly had no self awareness.
No, the people who call magazines "clips" call suppressors, a "silencer."I guess I should have told that guy that we aren’t in Europe, in America we call them silencers.
Considering its the government, I wouldn't be surprised if the dollars in don't even cover the costs to run the department.The thought of the federal government letting go of a cash cow tax is nearly impossible to conceive.
It is a muffler, the people who call mufflers "suppressors" are the same people who "run" scopes and are scared to roll a ball cap bill....No, the people who call magazines "clips" call suppressors, a "silencer."
Thanks for the correction; I misunderstood the law in Cali.California won't even allow most people to purchasefirearmshandguns with threaded muzzles.
Considering its the government, I wouldn't be surprised if the dollars in don't even cover the costs to run the department.
It definitely does not cover their costs, and we are very lucky that 1934 NFA fee is fixed and doesn't adjust with inflation. That $200 fee back then would be nearly $5k in today's dollars.I think you were partly being sarcastic, but I think you are 1000% correct. It certainly costs the government more than $200 in administrative costs to process the tax stamp.