hunting ban isnt left wing.. one side clearly favors science.This is why I am so blown away that ANY hunter could support left wing politics in the name of public lands. Some good your public lands are if you can't even hunt on them. The left is anti hunting and trapping and we're gonna see some really bad policies that directly affect us over the next 2-4 years...if not longer
Post #36If anyone has good links of places to send feedback for this feel free to post up. I'm going to tell whoever will listen even though I don't live in CA.
I’m on board with you, but politics aside. I cannot see one legitimate reason why this move would be in CA best interest.They don't care about the tag sales as they can't spend it on socialist crap.
This story explains thier "reasons". SMH.What is the reason behind wanting to ban bear hunting in California? I just don’t see a real legitimate reason behind wanting this.
Bears are far from underpopulated
CA makes a lot of revenue in tag sales every single year.
I didn't have to register to submit my comment using the non-resident link. I did get a "comments sent" screen.For California Residents:
Click here to find your state representative and contact them. In addition to contacting your representative, leave a comment here. Input from CA residents absolutely weigh more, so please, urge every sportsman and woman you know to do the same.
For Non-Residents:
Click here to leave your comment. Don't be discouraged about comments from CA-residents carrying more weight, they will notice an influx of comments. Getting their attention is exactly what we need!
When you leave a comment you will have to register, but you do not need to be a California resident to do so. If you have any trouble give us a shout and we'll help best we can.
One last note, please remain professional and courteous when leaving your comments/contacting your representative.
Maybe so, but they will cry about the lost revenue and will try to make up for it from somewhere. Where exactly? Who knows, but I do know WE will end up paying for it.They don't care about the tag sales as they can't spend it on socialist crap.
Even better! Thanks for sharing. I was forced to register for my personal comment, but hopefully your experience holds true for everyone else.I didn't have to register to submit my comment using the non-resident link. I did get a "comments sent" screen.
They signaled their intent when they changed their name.Maybe so, but they will cry about the lost revenue and will try to make up for it from somewhere. Where exactly? Who knows, but I do know WE will end up paying for it.
BTW, our state game agency is about as reflective of the rest of the state as it gets when compared to other state game agencies. If its got California in front of it's name it's a pretty safe bet it's horseshit.
They signaled their intent when they changed their name.
There is no legitimate reason. It's all emotion which is why I believe we have a good chance to win this if we get our voices heard.I’m on board with you, but politics aside. I cannot see one legitimate reason why this move would be in CA best interest.
Thanks for mentioning The Sportsman Alliance. I had been meaning to join. Their sight at least has information up about the proposed ban so I joined and gave them quite a bit.As a NR, I don’t know how much I can help. I sent an email to Sportsmen’s Alliance, with the link provided. I’m not a member(or fan) of BHA, but I’ll email them as well.
Just goes to show the lack of control and impact the DFW really has. Just like everything in California "You can do it your own way, if it's done just how I say". Gotta give credit to Metallica for that one.In their defense, the department didn’t change their name. Lawmakers did
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk