Balderdash
WKR
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2022
- Messages
- 905
I've had both. The LRHS is FFP. Due to reticle, I'd take the Bushie.Interested in this vs LHT. Any new info?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've had both. The LRHS is FFP. Due to reticle, I'd take the Bushie.Interested in this vs LHT. Any new info?
Nice looking rig. What stock is that?My 4.5-18 is still in the box as I found a 3-12 that I ended up using. I like the length of the 3-12 better on my sporterish rifle.
View attachment 689437
You been under a rock these past few years??Solid? How long did that last? Never knew Bushnell representing anything except cheap and low end.
Evidently.You been under a rock these past few years??
Here you go.Evidently.
Evidently.
Nice looking rig. What stock is that?
Let me know if you might want to sell the one you’re not usingMy 4.5-18 is still in the box as I found a 3-12 that I ended up using. I like the length of the 3-12 better on my sporterish rifle.
View attachment 689437
I was pretty confident it was a little canted from testing in my fixed mount. I shot a tracking test with it though and if it was canted, it was less than a click of windage error over 8 mils of elevation dialed so pretty good.Reviving an older one here, does anyone else have any more info to share about these scopes? @wind gypsy did you ever re test yours to see if it was in fact tracking incorrectly?
Good to know then. I wish form would drop one. I’m interested in the new unknown scope but i have a feeling they’ll be rare as hens teeth once they come out. This seems like it may be a decent option if the durability is there.I was pretty confident it was a little canted from testing in my fixed mount. I shot a tracking test with it though and if it was canted, it was less than a full click over 8 mils of elevation dialed so pretty good.