I am running the same combo. 22” proof 7 saum on an origin action. Berger 168 vld but with h1000 and at 2970fps. I tried h4350 but couldn’t get the velocity. Absolutely love that setup!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you have a picture of a loaded 7 Saum with 168?7 SAUM
I run mine with 168 VLDs. Recoil is mild, bucks the wind well, delivers some payload at distance. Ive laid down all my elk and deer with that caliber. I use it as a preference over my 300 PRC.
For what it’s worth, I shot my first NRL hunter match with the SAUM earlier this year. I liked playing the game so I order a 6.5 creed barrel. Right now I use my HNT chassis and origin action with 2 different barrels (7 SAUM / 6.5 creed) and 2 different scopes (Nightforce for hunting / MK5 for NRL).
View attachment 645989
I’d be interested in a 6.8W if there was quality brass available.I'm happy with the 6.8W
Those all require a magnum bolt face... Make sure you can switch the bolt or bolt body in addition to the barrel.I'm building a 6.5 Creedmoor for NRL Hunter on a TL3 action. I would like one rifle that I can use for hunting and matches. Obviously 6.5 Creedmoor is not the ideal long range hunting cartridge. With the TL3 I can easily switch barrels, so trying to decide on a long range hunting caliber for a second barrel that will fit a short action. Looking at 6.5 PRC, 7 SS, 7 SAUM. I know short action is going to limit the performance on the 6.5 PRC and 7 SAUM and not sure I want to go down the wildcat rabbit hole. 700-800 yards is really my max range I would shoot for up to Elk size game. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
Are they really though?Still, with the military being enamored with the 277 fury, I have high hopes for the 6.8 caliber at some point.
You may be right. I personally don't expect widespread adoption by the civilian market of the 277 fury (at least not to the extent of the 5.56). The military adopted the cartridge in 2022 and I'm not totally sure what has happened since then. I've read some speculation that the cartridge will be limited to certain units or MOS. Still, assuming it sees some adoption by the military, I expect that they will want bullets that meet certain standards. So I do have hope that we'll see better support from the manufacturers for the .277 caliber, which will be a boon for handloaders.Are they really though?
Who's actually issuing a bunch of 277 fury chambered weapons thus far?
You may be right. I personally don't expect widespread adoption by the civilian market of the 277 fury (at least not to the extent of the 5.56). The military adopted the cartridge in 2022 and I'm not totally sure what has happened since then. I've read some speculation that the cartridge will be limited to certain units or MOS. Still, assuming it sees some adoption by the military, I expect that they will want bullets that meet certain standards. So I do have hope that we'll see better support from the manufacturers for the .277 caliber, which will be a boon for handloaders.
You may be right. I personally don't expect widespread adoption by the civilian market of the 277 fury (at least not to the extent of the 5.56). The military adopted the cartridge in 2022 and I'm not totally sure what has happened since then. I've read some speculation that the cartridge will be limited to certain units or MOS. Still, assuming it sees some adoption by the military, I expect that they will want bullets that meet certain standards. So I do have hope that we'll see better support from the manufacturers for the .277 caliber, which will be a boon for handloaders.
I guess that I'm wrong. Oh, well so much for that hope.The required projectiles for the 6.8x51mm are short and stubby. They aren’t high BC projectiles.