thinhorn_AK
"DADDY"
Yeah for sure. Stone glacier bags are made in China aren’t they?Feathered Friends or Western Mountaineering. Remember when made in the USA meant something? It still does, FF and WM are the best available.
Yeah for sure. Stone glacier bags are made in China aren’t they?Feathered Friends or Western Mountaineering. Remember when made in the USA meant something? It still does, FF and WM are the best available.
Vietnam I think.Yeah for sure. Stone glacier bags are made in China aren’t they?
Same difference really. Both are communist shitholes. Vietnam is better than China though.Vietnam I think.
Do you wear a hood thing or just a beanie when sleeping? Or does it not matter much? I havnt had a hoodless bag in many many years.The lightest bag available that is rated into the teens is the Feathered Friends Tanager 19f 950 fill down. It’s a hoodless/zipperless bag. Far warmer than an equivalent quilt in my experience as there are zero drafts that can get in. It weighs 19 oz.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without the zipper, does it suck when you have warm temps at night, with no way to vent the bag?Beanie if it’s 40’s. If it’s below that, I have a super light, but very warm, apex synthetic ‘hoodlum’ from Enlightened equipment. It weighs about 2.5 oz I think. Not only is it great for use with this bag or a quilt, you can continue wearing it around camp once you get up. Super versatile. I also have a pair of apex booties from them that weigh under 2 oz that are for use only in the shelter and bag. No reinforcements on the bottom. They keep your feet extra toasty in cold temps.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not using the bag mid summer, only starting in August in the mountains, where its normally low 40's and below. No issue with being too warm. It easily pushes down if you do want to vent more. Its not meant to be a versatile sleeping bag, its a specialized bag that does very well at what its intended to do. A Flicker would be a better choice for someone who wants more venting options.Without the zipper, does it suck when you have warm temps at night, with no way to vent the bag?
I'd get the 74". I'm 5'6 and use the 68".I'm 6'. Should I get the 68, or 72" tanager?
Good point, this bag is a 900+ fill of treated down. Baffles inside to reduce down shifting around.No experience w/ that particular Marmot, but when comparing bags I really want to know all the dimensions (length and shoulder/hip/foot width) and even more importantly the amount and rating of the down fill.
Weight is obviously important for a backpacking bag, but you want to make sure you're comparing apples to apples.
I haven’t been able to find that info, part of why I am asking for experience. My assumption is that they are saving weight from less of a zipper but they are also saving weight from less fill and off setting with a better fill ‘power’. Just my assumption.Fill weight between the two?
Thanks for the tip, I will do that and follow up with you.email Marmot to get the fill weight, sad it isn't on there- one of the most important specs
I'm sure there is some savings w/ the zipper, but you HAVE to know the fill weight to compare the two bags
900 fill will have minor weight savings vs 850, but not much.
That's a very slim cut bag with those specs. Foot box is fairly roomy, but 60" at the shoulders is going to be tightGood point, this bag is a 900+ fill of treated down. Baffles inside to reduce down shifting around.
45in at footbox
54in at hip
60in at shoulder
1lb 8oz total weight
Those were key stats I found relevant. My opinion looking at the stats is that this should be an equivalent bag to the SG but lighter. I know that is really hard to say without experience using the bad. The treatment could suck and wet out easy, bad could not live up to its rating etc