Best 15 degree down bag

Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,375
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
The lightest bag available that is rated into the teens is the Feathered Friends Tanager 19f 950 fill down. It’s a hoodless/zipperless bag. Far warmer than an equivalent quilt in my experience as there are zero drafts that can get in. It weighs 19 oz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

thinhorn_AK

"DADDY"
Joined
Jul 2, 2016
Messages
10,442
Location
Alaska
The lightest bag available that is rated into the teens is the Feathered Friends Tanager 19f 950 fill down. It’s a hoodless/zipperless bag. Far warmer than an equivalent quilt in my experience as there are zero drafts that can get in. It weighs 19 oz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you wear a hood thing or just a beanie when sleeping? Or does it not matter much? I havnt had a hoodless bag in many many years.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,375
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
Beanie if it’s 40’s. If it’s below that, I have a super light, but very warm, apex synthetic ‘hoodlum’ from Enlightened equipment. It weighs about 2.5 oz I think. Not only is it great for use with this bag or a quilt, you can continue wearing it around camp once you get up. Super versatile. I also have a pair of apex booties from them that weigh under 2 oz that are for use only in the shelter and bag. No reinforcements on the bottom. They keep your feet extra toasty in cold temps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
S

sivart

WKR
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
623
Beanie if it’s 40’s. If it’s below that, I have a super light, but very warm, apex synthetic ‘hoodlum’ from Enlightened equipment. It weighs about 2.5 oz I think. Not only is it great for use with this bag or a quilt, you can continue wearing it around camp once you get up. Super versatile. I also have a pair of apex booties from them that weigh under 2 oz that are for use only in the shelter and bag. No reinforcements on the bottom. They keep your feet extra toasty in cold temps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Without the zipper, does it suck when you have warm temps at night, with no way to vent the bag?
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
9,600
Location
Montana
I used sleeping bags for decades, then quilts for about 15 years and now using "hybrid bags

My 15 degree bag is a Feathered Friends Flicker 20 w/ 2 ounces of overfill; the Flicker offers a full zip that allows it to be used as a full quilt, quilt with a footbox or as a sleeping bag. I have a 30 as well (no overfill) for "summer"

https://featheredfriends.com/collec...ed-friends-flicker-ul-down-quilt-sleeping-bag
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,375
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
Without the zipper, does it suck when you have warm temps at night, with no way to vent the bag?
I'm not using the bag mid summer, only starting in August in the mountains, where its normally low 40's and below. No issue with being too warm. It easily pushes down if you do want to vent more. Its not meant to be a versatile sleeping bag, its a specialized bag that does very well at what its intended to do. A Flicker would be a better choice for someone who wants more venting options.
 

Jimss

WKR
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
2,077
I always find that it's possible to shed layers to stay cooler but is a bummer if you are cold at night. It's nice to have the option of unzipping or sleeping on top of your bag if it's too warm. Sleep is that important! Layering in bed is your best buddy if you want to travel light. Everyone is a little different. I actually use a 0 degree bag that I can unzip for ventilation when warm and close up completely when cold.
 

ElkPRC

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
124
Does anyone have experience with the Marmot Banthemweight 15 degree bag? It’s a down bag and weights less than the Stone Glacier. I welcome input from anyone who has used it, thanks!
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
9,600
Location
Montana
No experience w/ that particular Marmot, but when comparing bags I really want to know all the dimensions (length and shoulder/hip/foot width) and even more importantly the amount and rating of the down fill.

Weight is obviously important for a backpacking bag, but you want to make sure you're comparing apples to apples.
 

ElkPRC

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
124
No experience w/ that particular Marmot, but when comparing bags I really want to know all the dimensions (length and shoulder/hip/foot width) and even more importantly the amount and rating of the down fill.

Weight is obviously important for a backpacking bag, but you want to make sure you're comparing apples to apples.
Good point, this bag is a 900+ fill of treated down. Baffles inside to reduce down shifting around.
45in at footbox
54in at hip
60in at shoulder
1lb 8oz total weight

Those were key stats I found relevant. My opinion looking at the stats is that this should be an equivalent bag to the SG but lighter. I know that is really hard to say without experience using the bad. The treatment could suck and wet out easy, bad could not live up to its rating etc
 

ElkPRC

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
124
Fill weight between the two?
I haven’t been able to find that info, part of why I am asking for experience. My assumption is that they are saving weight from less of a zipper but they are also saving weight from less fill and off setting with a better fill ‘power’. Just my assumption.
 

mtwarden

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
9,600
Location
Montana
email Marmot to get the fill weight, sad it isn't on there- one of the most important specs

I'm sure there is some savings w/ the zipper, but you HAVE to know the fill weight to compare the two bags

900 fill will have minor weight savings vs 850, but not much.
 

ElkPRC

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Messages
124
email Marmot to get the fill weight, sad it isn't on there- one of the most important specs

I'm sure there is some savings w/ the zipper, but you HAVE to know the fill weight to compare the two bags

900 fill will have minor weight savings vs 850, but not much.
Thanks for the tip, I will do that and follow up with you.
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,063
Location
ID
Good point, this bag is a 900+ fill of treated down. Baffles inside to reduce down shifting around.
45in at footbox
54in at hip
60in at shoulder
1lb 8oz total weight

Those were key stats I found relevant. My opinion looking at the stats is that this should be an equivalent bag to the SG but lighter. I know that is really hard to say without experience using the bad. The treatment could suck and wet out easy, bad could not live up to its rating etc
That's a very slim cut bag with those specs. Foot box is fairly roomy, but 60" at the shoulders is going to be tight

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
 
Top