sndmn11
"DADDY"
True, but nobody is really worried about archers accidentally shooting other archers or muzzleloader hunters. So I guess my question is how do gun hunters wearing orange make archery hunters safer? Pending details, the above incident may be an example of why this isn't great logic.
Aside from archery season possibly being shortened, wouldn't all parties involved be happier if the seasons did not overlap?
I am not really taking the position that it does, other than the fact that I can identify the likely effective range of that orange/pink hunter. I do love ke that for the simple fact I can see a hunter at 150 yards not in color and know we are likely out of play for each other. Whereas if I saw someone at 150yds in color, they would have a good bit of my attention. I have argued in the past that it may create a more dangerous situation because a rifle/muzzloader hunter puts on their color, and that establishes the mindset to not shoot the color. So, if their sight picture doesn't contain the colors, nothing in their mind sounds an alarm to not shoot. I think this applies to people who are borderline uncomfortable with handling firearms.
My opinion is that everyone in color or nobody in color, this is a people doing dumb stuff problem and not a regulation problem.
I couldn't care less about sharing with others. I have a rifle bear tag in one unit and I have an OTC archery tag as well that is not valid where my bear tag is. Almost bought a leftover muzzloader tag for my wife last week.
In my above example, if the woman muzzleloader hunter would have setup with her weapon at the ready, I would have called out. I surely can be responsible for taking steps to help ensure my own safety.
The only factors preventing archery accidents are the limited range and the physical act of knocking the arrow and drawing a bow.
I do think that the reporting on these incidents leaves out a significant amount of detail that would provide context. The incident last year, I never remember reading any details.