Nope , no answers to any questions, just gave me a couple of web links to their website.They definitely should know the answer to those question, or atleast be able to find out.
Did they comment about additional reticle options.
Nope , no answers to any questions, just gave me a couple of web links to their website.They definitely should know the answer to those question, or atleast be able to find out.
Did they comment about additional reticle options.
Well that's confidence inspiring...Nope , no answers to any questions, just gave me a couple of web links to their website.
Yeah it's relatively thin elsewhere. There are dots in the vertical stadia at 1 mil, 2 mil 3 mil etc, which are smaller than the center dot. I really like the tenmile 3-18 reticle, I just wish there was more seperation between the dot and vertical/horizontal stadia at the center region.Man, a 0.2 mil center dot would bother me too! The rest of the crosshairs and hashes must be 0.05 or less thickness? Odd to have such a thick center dot and then be thin elsewhere.
Optical sample variation seems to be a common complaint with scops made by the manufacturer Apex uses (JOL).I shoot PRS north of the border and although I’ve never ran apex I have chatted with a few with experience with them and the feedback isn’t great. Anecdotally there is some inconsistency in glass clarity. One shooter had three apex scopes and noted not one was the same with regards to glass clarity and colour.
I have also had hands on with one apex model at the local shop and found the turret hash marks crept out of alignment and after only one revolution the turret was out a full click click (0.1 MOA). Who knows what the actually reticle elevation was? For $2500 I’d be pissed if my turret didn’t line up.
As a reference point, a $700 vortex venom will track spot on for hash alignment, clicks and actual reticle elevation.