I've read quite a few threads about this subject on here. most are a bit older and i was wondering if opinions have changed. currently, i have a tikka 270wsm that shoots well, has a nice factory trigger and kills my elk just fine. it is topped with a vortex pst 4-16 and weighs just over 9lbs (w/ 3 rounds, sling, cheek pad) w/o bipod. i'd really like to lose some weight with a new rifle for longer trips. i'd expect this gun to shoot out to 500 yards and weigh in the low 7lb range setup to hunt. this has led me to looking at a kimber montana (5lb 2oz in a 6.5 cm). unfortunately, i'm only able to lay hands on the hunter and mtn ascent. the hunter had a rough action that locked up overly tight, imo. the MA was smoother but not as smooth as the tikka superlite or my current t3. i also noticed if i didn't pay attention to my side pressure on kimber actions the bolt would hang up in the far rear position. it really needs an inline push to smoothly cycle even the higher end mountain ascent.
so, i can get any of the lite kimbers and hit my desired weight or i can get a reliable t3x superlite and weight a bit more but be just slightly over my desired weight. the second choice will cost less but again be about a pound heavier than the montana. should i take a chance on the quality of kimber or go with a trusty favorite?
so, i can get any of the lite kimbers and hit my desired weight or i can get a reliable t3x superlite and weight a bit more but be just slightly over my desired weight. the second choice will cost less but again be about a pound heavier than the montana. should i take a chance on the quality of kimber or go with a trusty favorite?