Airlock Zero Gravity Nano (.224)

[Q_Sertorius]

How in the hell are you guys buying these? Or any Airlock Suppressor for that matter?

I bought mine on 1/1.

 

[Trackselk]

How in the hell are you guys buying these? Or any Airlock Suppressor for that matter?

You have to buy them the second (or few minutes) when the pre-sales open up. Sign up on the website with your email to get notifications of pre-sale times

 

[JoeK]

Yea I was on my A game for black friday and got my nano approved a few weeks ago. I ventured out to pre-order the ZG7 on one of the early pre-orders before the buzz was quite what it is now.

 

[nmhunter79]

How in the hell are you guys buying these? Or any Airlock Suppressor for that matter?

Yep I felt the same way…I got added to any email updates so I can take advantage of opportunities to purchase next go around!

 

[abilliott]

My 7 was just released from jail today. Trust submitted on 3/6 and approved 4/2

 

[AirlockIndustries]

For those interested, Rob from Silencer Analytics reached out and mentioned he’s been getting a lot of requests in the comments to review one of our suppressors. I sent him over a Nano to review, Here is a link.

 

[mt100gr.]

I think i am as excited for my Nano as I was for my first ever suppressor. Should be certifying first part of next week! (1/1 order)

 

[FB Trout]

I shot mine today on a Tikka .223; very impressive.

 

[Styger]

The test to failure on YouTube was interesting at least. 5 minutes of open purchasing per quarter would be a nice problem to have.

 

[Coopsdaddy]

the ZG6.5 is so close to what your asking for in a nano+ and at 5" L it's a whopping 3/8" longer than a nano and 1.7"D. plus you can put on a much wider array of calibers. would it perform even better on .22cal with a .22 bore? sure, but better enough to add more sku's for airlock(Danny) to juggle? I doubt it.
Be great to see further testing but page 6 Danny posted some DB numbers he put a grain of salt on with the ZG6.5 coming in ~7db quieter than the nano.

Looking at these and there amazing.
I have a 6.5cm and 223 and was looking at the nano just for the 223 but the zg6.5 still seems the way to go for the size and weight difference.
Any of you have both?

 

[Presswood_936]

Looking at these and there amazing.
I have a 6.5cm and 223 and was looking at the nano just for the 223 but the zg6.5 still seems the way to go for the size and weight difference.
Any of you have both?

I have both , I’d go ZG 6.5 . The nano is comically small and sounds amazing for the size but the 6.5 is still so small . Actually get both

 

[Q_Sertorius]

Looking at these and there amazing.
I have a 6.5cm and 223 and was looking at the nano just for the 223 but the zg6.5 still seems the way to go for the size and weight difference.
Any of you have both?

I have both, but haven’t fired the Nano yet. It’s still in jail. It looks really nice for putting on a .224 caliber rifle. Mine is probably going to live on my 22” Tikka .22-250. The tiny diameter is a big selling point for me. Makes it easy to get the scope low where I like. The ZG 6.5 is rather fatter than I would like.

OG 6.5, Nano, ZG 6.5

Of course, the differences are all marginal.

 

[Bluefish]

Looking at these and there amazing.
I have a 6.5cm and 223 and was looking at the nano just for the 223 but the zg6.5 still seems the way to go for the size and weight difference.
Any of you have both?

I came to the same conclusion. The nano is tiny, but for a little bigger the zg6.5 is quieter and can handle larger calibers. Then I bought a os6s as it’s very similar to the zg6.5 and with the group buy cheaper and available. I really want to see if zg can do a 35 or 45 cal that’s light and quiet. At this point I have enough small cans, I want a better big one.