Air Lock Industries Suppressor

[JohnB]

Yes, you can just email it in later.

Ugh... Thanks Danny!

 

[ianpadron]

Are the Marvin and Nano the same thing?

 

[DannyB]

Are the Marvin and Nano the same thing?

Yes for now. The Marvin was originally a rimfire can. There are a lot of great rimfire options on the market, so we wanted to pursue something more original. We designed this to be a small centerfire suppressor (223), and during development we discovered that our tech works extremely well even with very small internal volume. Because of that, the Zero Gravity Nano was born.

 

[ianpadron]

Yes for now. The Marvin was originally a rimfire can. There are a lot of great rimfire options on the market, so we wanted to pursue something more original. We designed this to be a small centerfire suppressor (223), and during development we discovered that our tech works extremely well even with very small internal volume. Because of that, the Zero Gravity Nano was born.

Heck yeah, I'll be scooping one on the pre-order...now for that 338 can with dimensions like the 6.5 or 7 for us 338 fed and 358 win Fudds

 

[omicron1792]

Heck yeah, I'll be scooping one on the pre-order...now for that 338 can with dimensions like the 6.5 or 7 for us 338 fed and 358 win Fudds

Agreed. I need a can for a 20” 338 Lapua!

 

[ianpadron]

Agreed. I need a can for a 20” 338 Lapua!

NO! no big boomers, we need a little can with a big hole lol

 

[AZ_Hunter]

How is the recoil reduction of the 6.5 compared to the Scythe for those who shot both on the same host?

 

[naked wombats]

Is the 223 nano going to have 5/8 or 1/2" threads?

 

[SupressYourself]

3 nano going to have 5/8 or 1/2" threads?

According to the email I got:

Specs:

• Weight: Under 4 oz (current prototypes: 3.6–3.8 oz)
• Length: 4.625" (only adds 4" to overall OAL)
• Mounting: 5/8-24 threads (includes titanium 1/2-28 adapter)
• Rating: 16" 22 Creedmoor
• MSRP: $649

 

[naked wombats]

Badass.

 

[justin davis]

Looking forward to testing it out hopefully. I’ll compare it to my TBAC Magnus

 

[khuber84]

How is the recoil reduction of the 6.5 compared to the Scythe for those who shot both on the same host?

Exploding can with brake cap or without? The failure rate of the Scythe-Ti SHOULD make it a non-starter for anyone.

 

[AZ_Hunter]

Exploding can with brake cap or without? The failure rate of the Scythe-Ti SHOULD make it a non-starter for anyone.

Some of us already have the Scythe. Mine hasn’t blown up yet, and does a decent job reducing recoil.

 

[bergie]

How is the recoil reduction of the 6.5 compared to the Scythe for those who shot both on the same host?

I am interested in this as well. I know I should have been able to see the future when I bought the Scythe to know its was a non starter. But as it stands now it would be a good comparison to know if I could expect better or the same recoil reduction in the ZG.

 

[HuntHarder]

Lots of us, I believe yourself as well, already own a Scythe. It is the most impressive can I own currently, so comparing new cans to it does help when making a new purchase.

 

[Presswood_936]

Lots of us, I believe yourself as well, already own a Scythe. It is the most impressive can I own currently, so comparing new cans to it does help when making a new purchase.

I wasn’t focused on recoil when I shot them side by side on my 6.5 prc but I didn’t notice any difference in recoil . The airlock was quieter though .

 

[khuber84]

Some of us already have the Scythe. Mine hasn’t blown up yet, and does a decent job reducing recoil.

I have both, was in line to get the scythe when it first came out as it was the latest and greatest hunting can. Mines been used and lightly abused. 1500+ rds now and hasn't failed. Just waiting for it to say nope! no more!

The airlock amazes me. It's so quiet for it's dimensions. I was just shooting my lightweight 20in 65prc an hour ago with it. With the scope at 22x I had no problem watching the bullet on the 430y, 660y and 850y plates. I'm not pushing it hard, 2860 with a 140 from 20in pipe, but recoil is very light, rokstok also has something to do with managing the rifle in recoil.

 

[Jbird1]

Since the 7mm and 6.5mm versions are within 1oz of each other and only differ by 1/2” of length, how many of you are considering the 7mm version for your 6.5mm guns? Sure seems like if you own or plan to own both calibers it would be a no-brainer. Or am I missing something from a performance standpoint?

 

[khuber84]

Since the 7mm and 6.5mm versions are within 1oz of each other and only differ by 1/2” of length, how many of you are considering the 7mm version for your 6.5mm guns? Sure seems like if you own or plan to own both calibers it would be a no-brainer. Or am I missing something from a performance standpoint?

I ordered both. The dang 7mm version been in jail for 3 weeks now. I'll use the 7 on my 7saum, 65 Saum and 65 LRM as these are larger volume cases VS the creed/prc.

 

[Harvey_NW]

Since the 7mm and 6.5mm versions are within 1oz of each other and only differ by 1/2” of length, how many of you are considering the 7mm version for your 6.5mm guns? Sure seems like if you own or plan to own both calibers it would be a no-brainer. Or am I missing something from a performance standpoint?

I got to check mine out yesterday and the 7mm is still ridiculously small, the pictures do it no justice. For the tiny weight penalty the extra suppression is definitely a no-brainer, for me.