Air Lock Industries Suppressor

Are the Marvin and Nano the same thing?
Yes for now. The Marvin was originally a rimfire can. There are a lot of great rimfire options on the market, so we wanted to pursue something more original. We designed this to be a small centerfire suppressor (223), and during development we discovered that our tech works extremely well even with very small internal volume. Because of that, the Zero Gravity Nano was born.
 
Yes for now. The Marvin was originally a rimfire can. There are a lot of great rimfire options on the market, so we wanted to pursue something more original. We designed this to be a small centerfire suppressor (223), and during development we discovered that our tech works extremely well even with very small internal volume. Because of that, the Zero Gravity Nano was born.
Heck yeah, I'll be scooping one on the pre-order...now for that 338 can with dimensions like the 6.5 or 7 for us 338 fed and 358 win Fudds :unsure:
 
How is the recoil reduction of the 6.5 compared to the Scythe for those who shot both on the same host?
I am interested in this as well. I know I should have been able to see the future when I bought the Scythe to know its was a non starter. But as it stands now it would be a good comparison to know if I could expect better or the same recoil reduction in the ZG.
 
Lots of us, I believe yourself as well, already own a Scythe. It is the most impressive can I own currently, so comparing new cans to it does help when making a new purchase.
 
Lots of us, I believe yourself as well, already own a Scythe. It is the most impressive can I own currently, so comparing new cans to it does help when making a new purchase.
I wasn’t focused on recoil when I shot them side by side on my 6.5 prc but I didn’t notice any difference in recoil . The airlock was quieter though .
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0479.jpeg
    IMG_0479.jpeg
    572.1 KB · Views: 5
Back
Top