Hi yall,
Im writing this bc of the past seasons and what iv experienced. Im curious if people have had the same experiences. I had multiple run ins with guides that either one would ruin the hunt or was an overall bad experience talking with them.
I’ve been thinking a lot about the growing tension between guided hunting operations and the average hunter, and I think it’s worth having a more informed conversation about it.
There is the issue of localized pressure. While overall harvest quotas are managed per unit, they don’t always reflect how concentrated hunting activity becomes in specific, accessible public land areas. Research and field reports have shown that heavy, repeated pressure in the same zones can alter animal movement patterns, increase nocturnal behavior, and reduce opportunities for DIY hunters who rely on limited time and fewer resources to use. Public land is, by definition, a shared resource—but in practice, some guided operations effectively dominate high-quality areas through repeated use, and early occupation of key terrain. What I mean by this is when guides are non stop having clients and dominating a certain area they are making it extremely difficult for the avg Joe to hunt the same area. For example if you have valley A that has all the deer, elk, whatever and an avg Joe finds it, hes gonna hunt, kill his animal and leave. Now someone else might be hunt that same area and not have to deal with Joe due to him being 1 and done. Now take that same senario and put a guide in that picture. He is gonna have his books full and hunt that same valley or area repeatedly until the season is over. If another person wants to hunt that area he has to deal with repeated pressure from the guide and the clients he has out While not illegal, this can create a de facto exclusivity that undermines the principle of equal access.I get that people buy their tags, but now that guide is making profit off of the shared resource. Now im sure someone is gonna bring up the fact guides pay more for their licensing, but does that really compensate for the amount of people that would just go buy a tag and hunt on their own or with a friend/ mentor? I should clarify Im talking about public land guides in this case. I get there is money that comes from guides that helps toward conservation, but is it worth ruining the experiences/ opportunity of the avg person? You can say well guides help newer people get into the sport, and ill admit yes that is true.
Additionally when it comes to waterfowl hunting. You can never find a farmer to give permission now. Every piece is locked up or the farmer had a bad experience with a guide and wont let hunters on his land anymore. I had a guide drive up onto my own land and tell me,(not knowing i own the place), "you better get out of here. im hunting this border tm and have 8 clients coming out" Told me to pack my shit and trespassed. People come from out of state hoping for a DIY hunt now and cant even do that bc of the guides that lock places down. We have guides in our area that once they hear that a blind shoots good, offer an insane amount of money and then boom that place is locked.
I had a run in with a guide that literally ran us off the trail with his horses. He wouldn't let us use the spring at camp bc he had a pvc pipe in it to collect water better. We ran into several hikers that reported to us they had the same experience with this guide and it left a sour taste in my mouth. Additionally we had heard throughout our time there 15-20 shots a day from the guides. Later while glassing, we could see them on a ridge, taking multiple 800 yard plus shots with clients. We found 4 bucks with limps/ what looked like holes in there rear. We found one buck that we watched for days and confirmed he had been shot in the rear gut from these long distance shots. Im sure not all guides are like this and im sure their are some great public land guides that are genuine good dudes, but it brought alot of questions in my head that i wanted to share. I just feel as if with how popular hunting is becoming that there is this constant need/ new level of competition that is causing some guides to now ruin or get rid of DIY hunters. Dont get me wrong there is also hunter on hunter issues as well.
Im writing this bc of the past seasons and what iv experienced. Im curious if people have had the same experiences. I had multiple run ins with guides that either one would ruin the hunt or was an overall bad experience talking with them.
I’ve been thinking a lot about the growing tension between guided hunting operations and the average hunter, and I think it’s worth having a more informed conversation about it.
There is the issue of localized pressure. While overall harvest quotas are managed per unit, they don’t always reflect how concentrated hunting activity becomes in specific, accessible public land areas. Research and field reports have shown that heavy, repeated pressure in the same zones can alter animal movement patterns, increase nocturnal behavior, and reduce opportunities for DIY hunters who rely on limited time and fewer resources to use. Public land is, by definition, a shared resource—but in practice, some guided operations effectively dominate high-quality areas through repeated use, and early occupation of key terrain. What I mean by this is when guides are non stop having clients and dominating a certain area they are making it extremely difficult for the avg Joe to hunt the same area. For example if you have valley A that has all the deer, elk, whatever and an avg Joe finds it, hes gonna hunt, kill his animal and leave. Now someone else might be hunt that same area and not have to deal with Joe due to him being 1 and done. Now take that same senario and put a guide in that picture. He is gonna have his books full and hunt that same valley or area repeatedly until the season is over. If another person wants to hunt that area he has to deal with repeated pressure from the guide and the clients he has out While not illegal, this can create a de facto exclusivity that undermines the principle of equal access.I get that people buy their tags, but now that guide is making profit off of the shared resource. Now im sure someone is gonna bring up the fact guides pay more for their licensing, but does that really compensate for the amount of people that would just go buy a tag and hunt on their own or with a friend/ mentor? I should clarify Im talking about public land guides in this case. I get there is money that comes from guides that helps toward conservation, but is it worth ruining the experiences/ opportunity of the avg person? You can say well guides help newer people get into the sport, and ill admit yes that is true.
Additionally when it comes to waterfowl hunting. You can never find a farmer to give permission now. Every piece is locked up or the farmer had a bad experience with a guide and wont let hunters on his land anymore. I had a guide drive up onto my own land and tell me,(not knowing i own the place), "you better get out of here. im hunting this border tm and have 8 clients coming out" Told me to pack my shit and trespassed. People come from out of state hoping for a DIY hunt now and cant even do that bc of the guides that lock places down. We have guides in our area that once they hear that a blind shoots good, offer an insane amount of money and then boom that place is locked.
I had a run in with a guide that literally ran us off the trail with his horses. He wouldn't let us use the spring at camp bc he had a pvc pipe in it to collect water better. We ran into several hikers that reported to us they had the same experience with this guide and it left a sour taste in my mouth. Additionally we had heard throughout our time there 15-20 shots a day from the guides. Later while glassing, we could see them on a ridge, taking multiple 800 yard plus shots with clients. We found 4 bucks with limps/ what looked like holes in there rear. We found one buck that we watched for days and confirmed he had been shot in the rear gut from these long distance shots. Im sure not all guides are like this and im sure their are some great public land guides that are genuine good dudes, but it brought alot of questions in my head that i wanted to share. I just feel as if with how popular hunting is becoming that there is this constant need/ new level of competition that is causing some guides to now ruin or get rid of DIY hunters. Dont get me wrong there is also hunter on hunter issues as well.