- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,186
I know that from experience and 6mm pales in comparison available projectiles are concerned
How so?
I know that from experience and 6mm pales in comparison available projectiles are concerned
I was pontificating … give me a break would ya ?How so?
I've expended thousands of 243 AI and 6mm/284 rounds, LOVE them bothI was pontificating … give me a break would ya ?
I haven't read thru all 4 pages and im not a caliber expert or a handloader....but thought I would mention that when my son and wife started hunting, I had them using a 270 with Remington's Managed recoil loads. They kept the recoil down and the 270 was plenty on deer sized game. Just a thought. After looking at their website again, it appears they make the managed recoil load for the 7mm-08. That might be a good option to keep the recoil down, and continue to use the 7mm-08 for the young daughters without having to mess with different barrels, guns, etc.
Managed Recoil | Remington
Managed-Recoil® Centerfire Ammunition delivers trusted Remington® field-proven hunting performance out to 200 yards, with half the recoil.www.remington.com
Keep the 7mm-08
I sorta have to agree. 7mm-08 with 120gr bullets is basically a magnum .243, a very well rounded setup unless you are trying to stretch the range past 400yds. Then the .243 with 105gr+ bullets wins hands down.
The 6.5 is longer and thinner cuts through the air more efficiently so impact velocity carries longer distances. Also what the 243/6mm shine with it's bigger pills.So with the love affair over the past few years for 6.5 Creed... can anyone come up with a reason to choose 6.5 Creed over a 7mm-08 shooting 120 grain pills? Very legitimately interested in the answer to that question.
The 6.5 is longer and thinner cuts through the air more efficiently so impact velocity carries longer distances. Also what the 243/6mm shine with it's bigger pills.
Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
So with the love affair over the past few years for 6.5 Creed... can anyone come up with a reason to choose 6.5 Creed over a 7mm-08 shooting 120 grain pills? Very legitimately interested in the answer to that question.
In factory form- generally more accurate, cheaper, more readily available, and slight BC advantage.
But, why limit it to 120gr bullets?
News to me that 6.5 is cheaper. I see 7mm-08 everywhere from Walmart to Dick's to actual gun stores here, while 6.5 seems only to be in the latter. Can't speak to the holistic accuracy of 6.5 as a cartridge since I don't have enough experience with it.
120s for comparison because I shoot copper monos so want as much velocity as possible.
Quite the contrary. They are my favorite deer bullets. Outstanding terminal performance. Blood trails are short and wide enough for a blind man to follow, if they don't drop in their tracks. The largest deer I've shot with them to date - this (estimated) 250# muley - dropped literally in his tracks. Never took a step and I did not hit him in the shoulders but rather 2" behind the shoulders.Picked up a 7mm-08 last season, Shot one whitetail with it, never found it. Pretty sure it had to do with the Hornady Super Performance SST bullets. Blood trail was spotty like there wasn't an exit wound.
Have switched to 140g Nosler Accubonds this year. Shoots accurate, lets see how they work on a Whitetail.
Anyone else have problems with SST bullets in 7mm-08?
Picked up a 7mm-08 last season, Shot one whitetail with it, never found it. Pretty sure it had to do with the Hornady Super Performance SST bullets. Blood trail was spotty like there wasn't an exit wound.
Have switched to 140g Nosler Accubonds this year. Shoots accurate, lets see how they work on a Whitetail.
Anyone else have problems with SST bullets in 7mm-08?