ssimo
WKR
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2022
- Messages
- 302
I am not arguing against anything, i am curious to see a quote of a post where i "argued against the 7-08". I am just saying that the 7-08 has its own charateristics and they must be taken into account. Pros and cons, as with any caliber, including the 308. Lower power means less recoil, less noise, in these cases also more barrel life. All this comes at a price as far as external and terminal ballistic and this must be taken into account, depending on the kind of hunting one does. This is OBVIOUS, no arguing against anything. I would use a 7-08 without issues for my kind of hunting, 308 is just more convenient for me for several reasons i don't wanna discuss because i am sure everything i would wrote would be misinterpreted so it's a loss of time. If i was hunting elks and i could put togheter a dedicated rifle, i would choose something more powerful than a 7-08 and a 308 for sure, especially if i would shoot past 400 yards. This is my opinion based on my knowledge and experience, you are totally free to disagree and make some points against what i said. My points are not that difficult to understand, if you are not able or willing to do so it's not my problem, i don't wanna convince anyone. If you are emotionally invested in 7-08 and my simple and obvious points hurt you, not my problem. Just accept the reality of things. The perfect caliber doesn't exists.You hunt with a .308 and are arguing against a 7-08... which is a necked down .308 with better ballistics and sectional densities. I'm interested in the mental gymnastics you've practiced to reach that conclusion.
Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk
Many people on forums just look for arguing and interpret posts accordingly.
Last edited: