72,500 shots with 9 misses

[Macintosh]

Shelburne VT.

I live less than an hour from there. Guess I’ll have to check it out.

 

[Formidilosus]

I live less than an hour from there. Guess I’ll have to check it out.

It’s defiantly worth it. There are a few rifles that I am almost certain they got the dates wrong on, but overall the rifle exhibit is excellent. What it really shows in my view is how common aperture sights really were with hunters in the 1700 and 1800’s.

 

[Macintosh]

I’ll definitely check it out this winter.

…What it really shows in my view is how common aperture sights really were with hunters in the 1700 and 1800’s.

Case in point, right off the museum website:

 

[Formidilosus]

I’ll definitely check it out this winter.



Case in point, right off the museum website:



View attachment 954222

Oh yes. There’s probably 70-80 rifles in there, I’d guess 50+ have legit sights. The greatest collection that I’ve seen of contemporary long rifles.

It’s a whole other interest I have, but you may know that the “knowledge” of what rifles were in the 1700 and 1800’s is that they were extremely short range rifles with notch and post sights at most. Nevermind that nearly all the rifles were destroyed during the steel drives of the two world wars…. But, it’s always seemed preposterous to me that the rifleman of the era didn’t use aperture sights as the various long rifles were born out of German Jeager rifles- which commonly wore such sights. As well the belief that the rifleman only used a ridiculous drawn out affair with shot/possibles bags and not bullet boards, quick loaders, etc.

 

[Billy Goat]

When I see stuff like this it makes me wonder, how much did 22LR cost back then?

Like, 100k rounds seems to me like that would be a chunk of change back then, modern automation makes things like that cheaper.


Of course I could be wrong, I really dont know.

But hearing stories of guys splitting open stumps to reclaim lead makes it seem valuable. But, in Appalachia, everything is valuable.


Anyone got any idea, or how to figure a relative value of 100k .22 rounds from then? Like as a percentage of average income?

 

[Macintosh]

@Billy Goat that question has chatgpt written all over it. I look forward to your book report.

 

[Formidilosus]

Anyone got any idea, or how to figure a relative value of 100k .22 rounds from then? Like as a percentage of average income?

In 1910 it would be equivalent to about $1.00 a round today.

 

[Billy Goat]

In 1910 it would be equivalent to about $1.00 a round today.

I kinda figured more.

Just thinking of how it compares to sponsored events now.

 

[Billy Goat]

@Billy Goat that question has chatgpt written all over it. I look forward to your book report.

I have only used AI to create images or characters, you can use it for other things?

 

[Formidilosus]

I kinda figured more.

Just thinking of how it compares to sponsored events now.

It was human labor intensive- but human labor was way cheaper than it is now.

 

[gbflyer]

When I see stuff like this it makes me wonder, how much did 22LR cost back then?

Like, 100k rounds seems to me like that would be a chunk of change back then, modern automation makes things like that cheaper.


Of course I could be wrong, I really dont know.

But hearing stories of guys splitting open stumps to reclaim lead makes it seem valuable. But, in Appalachia, everything is valuable.


Anyone got any idea, or how to figure a relative value of 100k .22 rounds from then? Like as a percentage of average income?

My grandpa was born in the 1920’s and lived in what was then rural Oklahoma. As a kid he could get a box of .22 shorts for .20 but usually didn’t have it so the hardware store would sell him half a box for a dime.

Little later obviously but some context to cost.

 

[Castle Rock]

Doing the same dumb stuff over and over doesn’t mean much