I live less than an hour from there. Guess I’ll have to check it out.Shelburne VT.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I live less than an hour from there. Guess I’ll have to check it out.Shelburne VT.
I live less than an hour from there. Guess I’ll have to check it out.
I’ll definitely check it out this winter.
Case in point, right off the museum website:
View attachment 954222
Anyone got any idea, or how to figure a relative value of 100k .22 rounds from then? Like as a percentage of average income?
In 1910 it would be equivalent to about $1.00 a round today.
@Billy Goat that question has chatgpt written all over it. I look forward to your book report.
I kinda figured more.
Just thinking of how it compares to sponsored events now.
When I see stuff like this it makes me wonder, how much did 22LR cost back then?
Like, 100k rounds seems to me like that would be a chunk of change back then, modern automation makes things like that cheaper.
Of course I could be wrong, I really dont know.
But hearing stories of guys splitting open stumps to reclaim lead makes it seem valuable. But, in Appalachia, everything is valuable.
Anyone got any idea, or how to figure a relative value of 100k .22 rounds from then? Like as a percentage of average income?
exceptional hand eye coordination and eyesight
This is an interesting thread and a cool shooting history lesson. I'm not really up on American history (I'm Canadian), but do you think the great depression also had a factor in killing general shooting knowledge as there was less disposable income generally to devote to ammo costs? I try to read everything shooting related I can and I have noticed somewhat of a trend among gun writers of a certain era who either grew up then or had parents who grew up then who liked to mention that shooting more than necessary was generally frowned upon as wasteful. It was also around this era that the 3 shot group started gaining traction.Indeed. As well the two world wars did more to kill actual high level knowledge of shooting as a whole than anything else. The path the shooting world was on was spectacular: real data, real information, and with shooters/competitor’s shooting massive quantities of ammo per year. In just a couple of decades it went from custom rifles proof groups from the builders being 20 to 50+ shots per group as a standard, to “well the only thing that matters is the first 3 shots”.
This is an interesting thread and a cool shooting history lesson. I'm not really up on American history (I'm Canadian), but do you think the great depression also had a factor in killing general shooting knowledge as there was less disposable income generally to devote to ammo costs?
I had no idea! I live 45 minutes away from that museum and I build longrifles. What a resource!!Oh yes. There’s probably 70-80 rifles in there, I’d guess 50+ have legit sights. The greatest collection that I’ve seen of contemporary long rifles.
It’s a whole other interest I have, but you may know that the “knowledge” of what rifles were in the 1700 and 1800’s is that they were extremely short range rifles with notch and post sights at most. Nevermind that nearly all the rifles were destroyed during the steel drives of the two world wars…. But, it’s always seemed preposterous to me that the rifleman of the era didn’t use aperture sights as the various long rifles were born out of German Jeager rifles- which commonly wore such sights. As well the belief that the rifleman only used a ridiculous drawn out affair with shot/possibles bags and not bullet boards, quick loaders, etc.