Trying to decide between 6.5 x 55 and 6.5 PRC for my one and done, only rifle I need. Would love thoughts if my particular quandary is interesting to ya, but I know this topic is super beat so no worries if this is a hard pass.
I’ve been hunting with an inherited (Grandpa) 6.5x55 sporterized Mauser. It’s more of a saddle gun with a short 17” (?) barrel, 2x7 old school Leupold. While it’s fun to carry, it’s not super accurate. Like 1.5 MOA for me. Fine for hunting at 100 yards, but annoying at 300. Haven’t shot past that.
I approach guns as tools, so while I like shooting I don’t really collect them, or have any redundancy (ie. My safe has a 10/22, a Benelli M1 Super 90, and a Glock 43x in addition to the Swede). I’m looking for a do everything rifle in that same mentality.
I feel nostalgic about the Mauser but I’m getting more into hunting and I’d like a modern rifle, with modern glass on it.
In addition to deer, I want to hunt elk, and maybe antelope. I want to feel comfortable out to 400 yards - 500 max in ideal conditions.
Seems like that extra 100 yards is where things start tapering off for the 6.5x55 cartridge, so I’ve found myself reading up on the PRC as a natural step up. Do I really need it though?
I’m looking at getting a Tikka t3x superlite, but I’m trying to decide which chambering.
If I stay with the Swede, I can interchange ammo with the Mauser as a backup gun. I’m keeping it for sentimental sake either way.
But the 6.5 PRC seems like it sure keeps on truckin at 400+, and I don’t want to buy another rifle two years from now just because I went too small the first time. Still, I wonder if I’ll resent the extra recoil and noise for the very few times that power actually makes any difference at all? I’ve never shot with a suppressor so maybe that’s the key?
I don’t reload.
I think I’m looking for someone with experience to either explain why the 6.5 x55 in the new gun is enough for my stated needs, or tell me why I probably should step up to the PRC. What would you do in my shoes etc.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
I’ll see if I can post a picture of this Mauser.
I’ve been hunting with an inherited (Grandpa) 6.5x55 sporterized Mauser. It’s more of a saddle gun with a short 17” (?) barrel, 2x7 old school Leupold. While it’s fun to carry, it’s not super accurate. Like 1.5 MOA for me. Fine for hunting at 100 yards, but annoying at 300. Haven’t shot past that.
I approach guns as tools, so while I like shooting I don’t really collect them, or have any redundancy (ie. My safe has a 10/22, a Benelli M1 Super 90, and a Glock 43x in addition to the Swede). I’m looking for a do everything rifle in that same mentality.
I feel nostalgic about the Mauser but I’m getting more into hunting and I’d like a modern rifle, with modern glass on it.
In addition to deer, I want to hunt elk, and maybe antelope. I want to feel comfortable out to 400 yards - 500 max in ideal conditions.
Seems like that extra 100 yards is where things start tapering off for the 6.5x55 cartridge, so I’ve found myself reading up on the PRC as a natural step up. Do I really need it though?
I’m looking at getting a Tikka t3x superlite, but I’m trying to decide which chambering.
If I stay with the Swede, I can interchange ammo with the Mauser as a backup gun. I’m keeping it for sentimental sake either way.
But the 6.5 PRC seems like it sure keeps on truckin at 400+, and I don’t want to buy another rifle two years from now just because I went too small the first time. Still, I wonder if I’ll resent the extra recoil and noise for the very few times that power actually makes any difference at all? I’ve never shot with a suppressor so maybe that’s the key?
I don’t reload.
I think I’m looking for someone with experience to either explain why the 6.5 x55 in the new gun is enough for my stated needs, or tell me why I probably should step up to the PRC. What would you do in my shoes etc.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
I’ll see if I can post a picture of this Mauser.