Quandary
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
- Messages
- 421
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wood/blued Alaskan version cut to 20"
I went down the Ruger path on three different 375. African model. Alaskan model. And a savage 375. It did make me fall in love with the 375 Ruger over the h&h.
Oh hell yes
@Formidilosus do I lean into doing it old school and just get in there with irons because I can, or do we think the dual cc would survive and not be too short eye relief? It has made it through something like 30k of abuse on a sr15.
Great point. A charge would be the time the battery somehow failed. Otherwise, I love the MDR-T6 reticle and locking turrets.The CC should/would hold up. But, the invisible reticle at 1x isn’t what I would want for the use personally. I would be looking at the Trijicon 1-6x’s or the NF 1-6x NX6. Oth have good reticle that can be seen at low power.
Any scope recommendations for a 375 used for buff on my Blaser r8?
Going back and forth between using an RMR, pulling my dual cc off another gun, or looking what else is out there. Mainly concerned that the dual cc eye relief is not as long as needed from a recoil perspective.
@Formidilosus do I lean into doing it old school and just get in there with irons because I can, or do we think the dual cc would survive and not be too short eye relief? It has made it through something like 30k of abuse on a sr15.
Great point. A charge would be the time the battery somehow failed. Otherwise, I love the MDR-T6 reticle and locking turrets.
I gotta say though, the cc mode 1x dot has been very fun.
I didn’t realize the NX6 has 0.5” longer eye relief than the dual cc. My main complaint with the trijicons is second focal plane, although for what I am talking about the German #4 post isn’t the worst idea….
Have you broken it at all or had any issues?I opted for a trijicon accupoint 1-6. At dangerous game distances, second focal plane won't matter. I see where they also make a 1-8 now with limited reticle options.
Have you broken it at all or had any issues?
I’m the guy who has RMA’d an elcan, RMA’d 4 nightforces, and broken several things other people have “had lots of use with no problems”
It’s a running joke among my group that my house is a vortex of destruction, and anything that makes it out of the house into the field is on borrowed time.
Agreed. However, I just know the Kudu of a lifetime is going to walk out at 300 yards when I’m tracking a buffalo, so part of me knows I’d be wishing for FFP and a reticle with mil hashes in that situation.SFP for the use I don’t think is an issue, and with current reticles may be preferable.
Model 70 stainless classic is the holy grail IMO. They pop up used regularly, often a little more money than its worth but they are great.
Current BACO model 70 alaskan would be a great choice. They balance better than the safaris. The safaris are too muzzle heavy and just too heavy in general. I had a model 70 express classic and it was awesome to shoot, but the barrel profile was heavier than necessary and it kinda sucked to tote around. If you want a new rifle that you can actually trust, youre limited to win model 70, sako, or higher end stuff like echols, parkwest (dakota), blaser etc.
Push feed model 70 express can be had for an absolute steal and I wouldnt have any heartburn about using one of those.