Time for another caliber success thread. Lets see those 270 kills whether it's the 270 Win, 270 WSM, or 6.8 Western. If you can remember post load, impact velocity and distance.
I can second that .270 130gr Hornady SST I killed a ton of deer with. Ranges from 10ft to 600 yards. I would have to look back but somewhere in the ~30-40 harvests with said combo. Lost a buck with a poor shot once and it was my fault.
Lost a doe hit in the front shoulder broadside just over 100 yards once.. that bullet did something bizzare. Tracked for over a mile and most of a day. The blood stopped and we were dumbfounded.
The .270 is capable of killing well with a lot of damage with the correct bullet/shooter.
Here are my 2 meat bucks shot with x bolt western hunter lr in 270 Winchester. They were shot with Nosler 165 ablr with 56.6gr of RL26 with muzzle velocity of 2870fps. They were shot at 30 and 35 yards
About 10 years ago I switched to a .270 Win. Killed around 20 elk, broadside, frontal, quartering both ways. Probably 50 antelope all the same shots, and maybe 15 deer with same shots, 2 Bear, and 1 moose. Almost all we're with 130 grain Core-Lokt, a handful with 145 Hornady.
100 yards walking towards me, nearly into my scent path, so I had to take a hard quartering towards angle shot. The 141 HHT bullet (3225 fps MV) from my 6.8 Western hit right where I aimed and dropped him in his track after zipping through the shoulder.
It's not much, but it's my first elk so I was happy with the results considering it was an OTC tag, public land, DIY hunt.
270 wsm 350 yards Barnes LRX 129 quartering away pretty hard. 3250Fps muzzle velocity. Went in the ribs out the front of opposite shoulder. Spun a tight circle and fell right there.
Why the 270 Win? It shoots flat, has mild recoil and kills well. Pretty much any 277 cal bullet performs well at 270 Win speeds. There are high b.c. bullets available, how many does one actually need? Many people that say there is a higher amount of good bullets available for 7mm but then only use one or two types anyway. The 280 is a good round but many of them aren't twisted fast enough so can't shoot any high b.c. bullets anyway. Bottom line is they all work and have minor differences between them that don't really make much difference in real world situations. Of the 3 rounds you mentioned like I eluded to earlier the 270 will recoil less and shoot flatter.
Brother’s Bull, 2023. Utah limited entry mid-rifle hunt, middle of October. Shot was 454 yards, steep downhill quartering away. Bullet entered just behind the last rib and never exited. Bull went about 15 yards and tipped over. Chest cavity was chunky soup. 1 shot, 140 Berger Hybrid Hunter.
Cousins bull, 2024. 140 yard shot, steep downhill broadside. First shot entered the neck and dropped him. She tried to put more in him but was too shaky, so we ran down and she put one more in his chest cavity. Pure. Carnage. 130 grain hornady interbond.
I don't have one but my two longtime hunting partners both shoot them. In fact the 270Win is all they shoot. I can't count how many muledeer and elk have fallen to their rifles. And one of them pretty much only uses the Nosler BT.
My dad shot a 270 win, so when my wife and I needed our first hunting rifle that’s what we chose. All 4 of these were taken with 130 core-lokt factory loads. Our Ruger American just likes them. From left to right 50 yards, 230 yards, 30 yards, 115 yards. All bullets were found against the offside hide and weighed 57-62 grains.