- Banned
- #11,461
And what happened after? Was this animal shot again? That does look nasty but was there much of a bullet left on the other side under the hide?You mean like this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what happened after? Was this animal shot again? That does look nasty but was there much of a bullet left on the other side under the hide?You mean like this?
Well maybe so. However I am not going to test it purposely on a deer. Might find out though night hunting feral hogs. Wish it would cool off a bit. We finally got a bit of rain and it looks like the highs are going to be mid eighties for a week.I think there are multiple pics in this thread demonstrating the 77TMK, e.g., being able to do this just fine. Not saying anyone should or shouldn't use them, just that they do seem to be capable of accomplishing this.
Well maybe so. However I am not going to test it purposely on a deer. Might find out though night hunting feral hogs. Wish it would cool off a bit. We finally got a bit of rain and it looks like the highs are going to be mid eighties for a week.
Where I like to hunt an exit that leaks blood is a plus. I don't mind a bit of bloodshot and in reality you can clean it up pretty good if you put in some effort. The hamburger laced with lead pieces sucks though. That said if meat is your goal don't shoot into the meat.If a person wants 100% certainty of an exit and zero bloodshot meat then the 77 TMK isn’t for you. If you want a disruptive bullet which penetrates to the offside ribcage and is very destructive to all things between the entrance and to the offside ribcage then the TMK is a champ.
Sounds like a question for the person who posted the picture.And what happened after? Was this animal shot again? That does look nasty but was there much of a bullet left on the other side under the hide?
I'd say not as capable as far as penetration goes. As for the level of damage, controlled expanding bullets at least partly reduce meat damage. However a standing broadside elk hit through the ribs with either would soon be dead.Fwiw imo
Comes down to low recoil preference and cost for practice.
223 55 GR soft point isn’t a great big game at 400+ but that 77 tmk is. puny cartridges benefit with increased destruction making more than suitable and capable vs a bigger caliber.
But I’m not sure I’d use a tmk in a 30 cal based early thread pics for the reason you bring up. 308 w/ 165 accubond is capable and yet 223/77 is equal easily in damage at 300 yards.
I’d just rather have 4 vs 16 lbs of recoil…
Good point.Sounds like a question for the person who posted the picture.
Finally got my hands on some XBR 8208 and loaded up 100 of the 77 TMK for the coming season and beyond. Hoping to kill my first antelope next month with this load and add another animal to the thread
View attachment 940048

My 16” AR is sub MOA. Shoots 73s, 75s, 77s great. Can swap my 3x9 trijicon for aimpoints or slap on other built uppers.
What would the 16” tikka give me over my current rifle as far as achievable goals?
My 11 year old son shot this cow elk at 210 yards with a 77 gr tmk in a .223 and the bullet destroyed the knuckle of the shoulder and proceeded to take out the heart and lungs. One shot and she went less than 50 yards and plowed nose first in the dirt. If a 77 tmk can make it through that shoulder and still take out the vitals, I’m pretty comfortable using it. That’s about the worst case scenario of shot placement and it passed with flying colors. It’s hard to wrap your mind around such a small cartridge being so effective after years of fudd lore programming our brains that we need enormous amounts of foot pounds of energy and whollup factor. It took me a while to get the guts to give it a try but the data in this thread convinced me to give it a go. Not telling you you have to do it, but I’m saying the bullet will do it. Crazy, isn’t it?I'd say not as capable as far as penetration goes. As for the level of damage, controlled expanding bullets at least partly reduce meat damage. However a standing broadside elk hit through the ribs with either would soon be dead.
Is the 73 ELDM available in 223 factory loads? I don't reload.Not sure what you’re hunting but the 73 ELDM gave me the same results as the 77 TMK at 223 velocity on whitetails.
I’m going to try the 75 ELDM in my 22 ARC this year. I expect similar enough results to not be concerned about the minor differences.
Yes.Is the 73 ELDM available in 223 factory loads? I don't reload.
Is the 73 ELDM available in 223 factory loads? I don't reload.
deleonrxgunsandammo.com
I use the 147 ELDM in my prc so Id be happy to use the 73gr if the TMK is hard to find.It is indeed. That will be my go to round when I try .223 hunting in 2026, as it shoots at an inch in my Tikka and I have a harder time finding loaded ammo with 77gr TMK. 73 ELDM is on store shelves regularly near me. The QC and velocity issues worry me a little bit though.