Correct. They were one of the biggest. Then their triggers were discovered to have a failure in design, and their QC dropped off the face of the planet. Now they’re where they are by their own failures.Well Remington was one of the biggest kids.
Correct. They were one of the biggest. Then their triggers were discovered to have a failure in design, and their QC dropped off the face of the planet. Now they’re where they are by their own failures.Well Remington was one of the biggest kids.
I disagree. The failure was in the adjustments. Whether it wasn't adjusted properly from the factory or maladjusted by the owner. But I agree they had a QC problem especially at the end. I haven't taken the new Timney apart but I suspect the reason Remington decided to use it is because it's not adjustable.Correct. They were one of the biggest. Then their triggers were discovered to have a failure in design, and their QC dropped off the face of the planet. Now they’re where they are by their own failures.
I disagree. The failure was in the adjustments. Whether it wasn't adjusted properly from the factory or maladjusted by the owner. But I agree they had a QC problem especially at the end. I haven't taken the new Timney apart but I suspect the reason Remington decided to use it is because it's not adjustable.
I'm watching just like everyone else for the TMK posts. You guys keep quoting me so the clogging up of the thread is on you lol.Prove it wasn't a design flaw.
There is a metric crap ton of information out there proving it is.
Your out of your depth.
Thank you for telling us your feelings.
What are you even doing in this thread? Why dont you start another thread about this and not clog up this one.
My apologies for engaging on this one. This thread is about people posting actual data on using the 223 on big game, but for some reason it also seems to be like flypaper for other random dogma.Yeah, this is a conspiracy of a bunch of Scandinavians and other Tikka fanboys on RS who are out to get US companies. I don't think anyone said (or has ever said) that any trigger system, or any mechanical device, is free from a risk of failure.
Sorry to the mods (and everyone else) for engaging in this troll diversion. This debate about R700 triggers has been beaten to death, and while I don't mind it being raised again - this isn't the thread for it.
Like the third photo where you can see your jeans through the exit hole.Antelope aren’t much of a bullet test but here’s 230 yards from a 77 TMK started at 2800fps. Buck took it behind the shoulder and ran 40 yards stopped and stood for 5 seconds or so and tipped over.
View attachment 611133
Entrance
View attachment 611134
Exit
View attachment 611135
Mag length (2.3") works just fine with the 77 TMK in a T3.Sorry - I know it's totally buried in here but I'll bump with relevant discussion.
I'm going to reload for the first time, roughly following Forms painless method. 77gr TMKs with varget in once fired Hornady brass. BR2 primers. Tikka T3X compact with Banish 30 Gold suppressor.
Amy recommendations on starting charges for powder and seating depth?
Can you create a thread on that feather lite AR build. I would not want it buried in this thread as that is too awesome.After reading this thread, I decided the 223/77TMK might allow for an "ultralight mountain rifle" of sorts. I built a 3# 1oz (bare rifle) bolt action AR 223.
Took this ~6' boar at 350 yards. I don't normally need to shoot this far and I've only shot one black bear further than that (with a 308 Win), but that was as close as the conditions allowed. I was a little hesitant as this was literally the first shot on game I've taken with the 77 TMK...but after seeing the results in this thread, I was confident it would work as long as I could place the shot. Shot was broadside just back of the shoulder. Hit there or maybe an inch or so forward of that.
He ran about 40 yards, started to wobble and then ragdolled down the mountain about 100 yards into some willows in the pic. Death moan right after he stopped.
Worked well but the damage to the lungs was a little less than I expected after seeing the explosive pics in this thread. Impact should have been above 2000 fps. Regardless, I'd say the results on time to death on 30 some closer bears with 308/30-06 haven't been any different, other than I'd most likely have a pass through on the same shot and more blood trail (which I didn't need)...but those rifles also weigh a lot more than 3#.
Bear as found where he stopped rolling down the mountain.
View attachment 611520
Lungs
View attachment 611544
View attachment 611545
Top of heart
View attachment 611549
Entrance in ribs
View attachment 611550
Entance shoulder removed
View attachment 611552
Far side shoulder removed with piece of jacket
View attachment 611553
View attachment 611554
I agree. This would be better.Can you create a thread on that feather lite AR build. I would not want it buried in this thread as that is too awesome.
I would be interested in a separate thread about these builds you have done.I can start a thread on these ultralight rifles (I've built several in several different chamberings) with a lot more detail if there's interest. I've been hunting with this basic setup for over a year now and really like it so far. Taken black bear, deer, moose and grizzly with them (those others were with a 300 HAM'R). They're so light I've literally had to double check that I didn't forget the rifle when it's slung on my shoulder with a daypack on. (Don't want to derail the 77 TMK thread with any of that though)
Appreciate your contribution to the thread and congratulations on the bear!After reading this thread, I decided the 223/77TMK might allow for an "ultralight mountain rifle" of sorts. I built a 3# 1oz (bare rifle) bolt action AR 223.
Took this ~6' boar at 350 yards. I don't normally need to shoot this far and I've only shot one black bear further than that (with a 308 Win), but that was as close as the conditions allowed. I was a little hesitant as this was literally the first shot on game I've taken with the 77 TMK...but after seeing the results in this thread, I was confident it would work as long as I could place the shot. Shot was broadside just back of the shoulder. Hit there or maybe an inch or so forward of that.
He ran about 40 yards, started to wobble and then ragdolled down the mountain about 100 yards into some willows in the pic. Death moan right after he stopped.
Worked well but the damage to the lungs was a little less than I expected after seeing the explosive pics in this thread. Impact should have been above 2000 fps. Regardless, I'd say the results on time to death on 30 some closer bears with 308/30-06 haven't been any different, other than I'd most likely have a pass through on the same shot and more blood trail (which I didn't need)...but those rifles also weigh a lot more than 3#.
Bear as found where he stopped rolling down the mountain.
View attachment 611520
Lungs
View attachment 611544
View attachment 611545
Top of heart
View attachment 611549
Entrance in ribs
View attachment 611550
Entance shoulder removed
View attachment 611552
Far side shoulder removed with piece of jacket
View attachment 611553
View attachment 611554
Took the words right out of my mouth.Not alternatively… Please stop talking about Remington 700 triggers in this thread, open a new thread