.223, 6mm, and 6.5 failures on big game

Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
60
shot placement , shot placement , shot placement
it he had been using a 308 he could have had 2 more pigs not waiting for the perfect shot on those trotters
make that a semi auto 308 and you could have had 3-4 more

at the end of the day is it about eradication & making meat or doing it with the limitations you put on yourself.
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
766
I would call Harvey_NW buddies cow experience a failure, if the bullet did not actually open and fragment. If the wound channel looked narrow and not highly destructive like is common with the other eldm bullets, then it didn't do what WE expect it to. There's no manufacturer statement for big game performance for this bullet. Relative to what those expect that do or would use them on game (WE) I think it failed.

The 147 is what I see stated most often as an expansion or fragmentation failure (in match bullet realm).
WE who? You and the mouse in your pocket? Kidding aside, I don't know about WE, but I know I don't view match bullets as all behaving the same. Some may tend to hold together more (apparently the 6.5 147 e.g.) and some may come apart more.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
2,801
WE who? You and the mouse in your pocket? Kidding aside, I don't know about WE, but I know I don't view match bullets as all behaving the same. Some may tend to hold together more (apparently the 6.5 147 e.g.) and some may come apart more.
Not a mouse, but the voices!

I think, or at least assume, most who use the EldM bullets for hunting have an expectation that they will produce highly devastating wounds and not just pass through with minor expansion. For myself, I do have some 147s but have not used them on game and at this point I've seen enough reports similar to this one that I won't use them for elk. I think I'll get some 140eldm or 143eldx to use instead.

That's just our opinion on it 😂
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
766
Well, me and my mouse are testing out 88 ELDM specifically because they apparently don't disrupt as much as some of the other ELDM and might balance performance more toward penetration. So there's at least two of us that don't consider the 147 performance a failure, just a different path to success! 😅
 

The Guide

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Messages
970
Location
Montana
Well, me and my mouse are testing out 88 ELDM specifically because they apparently don't disrupt as much as some of the other ELDM and might balance performance more toward penetration. So there's at least two of us that don't consider the 147 performance a failure, just a different path to success! 😅
Is that in the 223 that you're trying the 88?

Jay
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
766
Is that in the 223 that you're trying the 88?

Jay
Yes, after following Khntr's success with them from his 223 AIs on moose, I wanted to try them as well. If they work well for me, they'd also be cheaper and a lot more available than the 77TMK. Taking the Little Big Gun to OK and hopefully line up some hogs with the 88s.
 

FredH

FNG
Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Messages
79
Well I used a few 75 grain Hornady BTHP's on a meat buck this year. Cannelured version. Not impressed. First shot entrance. Quartering away.


Exit. bullet traveled up and left.



slightly damaged shoulder blade.


Went down very satisfyingly but got right back up and was making good time running. Second shot hit just below the backstrap. hitting the spine and dropping the deer. Entrance.
[url=https://postimages.org/][/URL]

Bullet went downward into guts and did not exit. Didn't look for it. Tenderloins damaged.



Last shot through neck as deer tried to drag itself to cover.l Entrance.


Exit.



Very little meat damage even the neck where the bullet hit the spine. The first bullet hardly damaged the backstrap. A very little piece of tenderloin.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
2,801
Well, me and my mouse are testing out 88 ELDM specifically because they apparently don't disrupt as much as some of the other ELDM and might balance performance more toward penetration. So there's at least two of us that don't consider the 147 performance a failure, just a different path to success! 😅
After seeing a lot of the results in that 22 Creedmoor thread, it had me thinking maybe I don't want to ever hunt with one! A lot of those wounds are pretty nasty looking. Maybe the 88 would do a little better in that regard but still provide plenty of damage. I like to see and exit when I can get one
 

mxgsfmdpx

WKR
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
6,087
Location
Outside
I'm saying the argument people constantly make about "all the bullets people claim failed have come out of a dead animal" like it's some kind of "gotcha!" is poor. As if none of these bullets were failures because the animal in question was recovered.
That wasn’t my position on the topic or what I was trying to convey at all, sorry.
 

The Guide

WKR
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Messages
970
Location
Montana
Yes, after following Khntr's success with them from his 223 AIs on moose, I wanted to try them as well. If they work well for me, they'd also be cheaper and a lot more available than the 77TMK. Taking the Little Big Gun to OK and hopefully line up some hogs with the 88s.
If it can be loaded at lengths that will fit into magazines, give enough fragmentation, and still have enough left to exit you might have the perfect bullet for sub 200 yard 223 hunting.

Jay
 

Thegman

WKR
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
766
If it can be loaded at lengths that will fit into magazines, give enough fragmentation, and still have enough left to exit you might have the perfect bullet for sub 200 yard 223 hunting.

Jay
"If it can be loaded at lengths that will fit into magazines"
✅ 2.318 in my Duramags. Could go longer if I window them, but doing pretty well at 2.318 oal with a Factory Crimp Die.

"give enough fragmentation, and still have enough left to exit"
❔ The 20k dollar question

"you might have the perfect bullet for sub 200 yard 223 hunting"

✅ Muzzle velocity is 2,560, so should stay above 1,800 out to 500 yards or so, further than my 77TMK load does. Catches up velocity wise to my TMK load by 300- 350 yards. The only bullets for my rifle that stay above 1,800 further out are the 75ELDM, 80ELDM and 80ELDX. I'm hoping the 88ELDM might stay in the "goldilocks" velocity window longer than any of them (?). Not too fast, not too slow, but just right...😅
 

treydfoster

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 4, 2023
Messages
106
I neck shot a small buck Thursday afternoon with a 73gr Eldm out of a 20in 223. Never found him. He showed on on the game camera today. You can see where I hit him. I guess that will be my last neck shot.
I prefer my neckshot to be closer to the base of the skull
 

LONE HUNTER

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
273
Have you ever shot a deer, or know of someone else shooting a deer with a larger caliber that also didn’t leave blood?
I saw a bull hit with a 300 PRC ELD M..... actually saw 2 of them. One at 900 one at 200. Neither left a blood trail. Anecdotal but like you said. It happens for sure...... I also shot a buck at 711 yards with a 143 eldx and it left a huge blood trail....... Blood trails are so inconsistent. hard to really judge much off of them.
 
Top