1911’s in general, 9mm versions specifically

In theory, yes, though I'd be sure to look through the sight before buying it to check for bloom, especially if you have any astigmatism or eye issues. Generally speaking, the cheaper the RDS, the lower the quality the emitter and the lens coatings. Learned this the hard way - on paper, one of the holosun enclosed pistol sights seemed excellent for a CCW gun, but once it arrived, it was literally unusable for me, the bloom was so bad. Green dots also seem to be worse for it than red dots. Thus far, I've been 100% satisfied with crispness of the dots on 2 Trijicon pistol RDS's, and an Aimpoint M4S.

As long as the dot's fine though, yes, in dry fire a cheap optic should be just as good as expensive in learning trigger press.

That said...there's just no replacement for quality, especially when you end up spending more eventually to do it right the second time. I can't give a recommendation on what cheap ones might work, but I know I've never had a Trijicon fail in about 50k rounds across 1 RMR and 1 RMR HD. Admittedly though, my data set on RDS's is pretty small, with just the two pistol optics.
I would only be using it for dry fire if I went cheap. Thanks!
 
When you say green's easier to see - we talking ability to pick up quickly, different light, etc, or are you getting less bloom with green?

Both I guess. I would loose a red dot on a bright sunny day unless I had it cranked way up. Which then would start to bloom out..

Also. Only green I have really played with has been that 6moa dot. So that might skew things a bit as well
 
So, how are the Kimber DS Warrior 1911's doing? I mean if ya found a Kimber Warrior DS and Tisas 2011 Carry or Full size, what are yall choosing? I thought I read Kimber was coming out with a 4.25 Warrior, but now I cant find any info, course I could have got it mixed up with something else.

Seeing positive reports on the warriors. Although they still have an internal extractor vs the external in the 2k11s. Not sure if that’s worth the $800 difference though.
 
One thing that struck me in some of the early announcements / 'reviews' of the Warrior was people talking about them being a model that is 'less than' the 2K11 - phrases such as 'cut some costs', 'reduced features' and so on ... the overall impression was the Warriors could be significantly 'less than' the 2K11s in features and performance.

I guess time will tell if any of that means problems for the Warrior platform as such. And whether future reviews talk about the Warrior for what it is, rather than it being compared semi-negatively to the 2K11.

You'd hope that Kimber having apparently taken on feedback from some experienced heavy users and modifying the 2K would mean that they have a lot of experience to put into the Warrior. In some ways, this might be a better approach than when a company makes a 'good enough' base model, and then tries for something advanced, but falls short. Will be interesting to see the longer-term reviews.
 
Back
Top