160 Nosler Accubond, 162 Eldx, or 168 Berger VLD

gman82001

WKR
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
349
For those of you who have been shooting the ELDX, what has the accuracy been like in 7 mag?
Browning x bolt speed lr and only got it this fall just before season but the 162 eld-x was sub Moa in multiple groups for me so took it hunting and took cow on a late season hunt.
 
OP
T

The_Whitetail_Kid

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 26, 2022
Messages
117
Another option I was told to consider, was the 175 Berger elite hunter. Has anyone had good results with it?
 

snowtoy83

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
255
Location
Southern Oregon
I would vote for 162 eldx. They are available, cheaper, most guns seem to shoot them well, and they have worked well for me. They are not a bonded bullet so don’t expect them to perform like an accubond.
 

Mark at EXO

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
582
I'd choose the AB for terminal performance, the ELD-X for cost/availability, and the VLD for pure accuracy.

All of that said, I hunted with the AB last year.
 

gethuntin

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
349
In my 7mag I have moved from 168 Bergers classic hunters to Accubonds. Been liking the performance on game of the AB in my 7mag over the Berger. Although i have not had an animal get away with the Bergers i have more confidence with AB from comparing the two. Like stated AB have been hard to find and Hornadys are always available so i will likely be working of an ELDX load for deer and keep my AB for elk until i can find more. Although i think the eldx are more than capable on elk as well.

*Just read the post above mine from Mark. In short that is exactly what i was trying to say.
 

Harvey_NW

WKR
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
1,928
Location
WA
If you're a high shoulder shooter or expect an exit wound and blood trail, accubond. If you prefer behind the shoulder and want a full energy dump and explosive fragmentation in the vitals, VLD or ELD. Those 2 also have an edge with BC that may factor into your max shooting range, but all 3 are good options. All 3 also shot well out of my 7 mag, I just didn't like searching for accubonds like an addict, and don't care about a hole on the opposite side because they typically fold when you hit your mark with the other 2.
 

madcalfe

WKR
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
984
Location
British Columbia
I use 178gr eldx and 180gr AB's in my 300wsm
178's ELDX get taken for goat/sheep hunts,
180AB's get taken when hunting elk.
if you have areas where you have some distance to shoot then ELDX will work
if you know your only going to be shooting say 300 yards and under id take the AB's
all my bulls have been shot within 50 yards in the timber and there is no way id trust a ELDX under 100 yards at a elk. I've had some poor performances on white tails within 70 yards using ELDX. But they work wonders 300 yards and out. Just my 2 cents
 

Blinddog

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Messages
173
Location
MN
160 gr Nosler partitions under 400 yards and 160 Nosler Accubonds 400+, both have been outstanding.
 

Chamon

FNG
Joined
May 31, 2023
Messages
11
Of these three choices, which bullet would you go with? This will be in a 7 Mag. I have all three bullets, haven’t shot the Eldx yet, but the AccuBond groups probably the best. It will be primarily used for larger game such as a mule deer and elk and I intend to use it on an upcoming aoudad hunt this fall. Which bullet do y’all think I should go with? Thanks
Of these three choices, which bullet would you go with? This will be in a 7 Mag. I have all three bullets, haven’t shot the Eldx yet, but the AccuBond groups probably the best. It will be primarily used for larger game such as a mule deer and elk and I intend to use it on an upcoming aoudad hunt this fall. Which bullet do y’all think I should go with? Thanks
+1 for Berger
 
Top