15x56/18x56 Bino Comparison questions

Alpine4x4

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Aug 24, 2022
Messages
175
Location
Washington
After deciding to get Swaros for my standard 10x42 EDC Binos I know my 15x56 Diamondback HD's will need to be upgraded. I dont use them a ton, but they are nice to have when glassing a longer distance as opposed to always looking through a spotting scope. I have a 15-45 and 20-60 scope for taking a closer look, but like the versatility of having 15's with me. That said I've started looking at upgrade options, but not wanting to spend $2000 as they just arent used as much as my 10x42's.

I've been looking at the Maven B5 15x56, 18x56, Razor UHD 18x56, and potentially the Zeiss Conquest 15x56. I plan to buy used or refurb and keep the cost around $1000 which I have seen these models at.

My question is, what are the pros and cons of each? I know the eye cups on the Mavens seem to be a constant complaint and I will be trying them out at a show in early February to see for myself. I know the Razors are huge and heavy. People seem to say the Zeiss has a blue tint to it vs the razors grey tint.

What are people using and what are your opinons? Is there an option I am missing other than a used set of SLC's which are outside the budget? Thanks!
 

hereinaz

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,964
Location
Arizona
I am happy borrowing my friends Razor HD 18x56 or Swaro 15 x 56 SLC. The difference between them is largely the edge to edge clarity. I don't feel inadequate with the Razor HD.

If that's what you have money for, try to find a used pair to get the most for your money.
 
OP
Alpine4x4

Alpine4x4

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Aug 24, 2022
Messages
175
Location
Washington
I am happy borrowing my friends Razor HD 18x56 or Swaro 15 x 56 SLC. The difference between them is largely the edge to edge clarity. I don't feel inadequate with the Razor HD.

If that's what you have money for, try to find a used pair to get the most for your money.
I can find them refurbed for right at $1000 which is appealing vs the used pricing of the SLC's at $17-1900.
 

Hoodie

WKR
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
1,077
Location
Oregon Cascades
I've used both the 15x56 and 18x56 B5 pretty extensively. Currently have the 18x56. It's got shallower depth of field, but I don't carry a spotter so I like the extra 3x. If you're going to carry a spotter I think it's tough to beat 8x42, 15x56, and a 65 or 80mm spotter as a total package.
 

pods8 (Rugged Stitching)

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
4,869
Location
Thornton, CO
Is there an option I am missing other than a used set of SLC's which are outside the budget? Thanks!
Meopta Meostar are well regarded also.

I have the SLC, had the zeiss but they didn't work for my eyes well. I ordered the Maven and also they didn't work as well for my eyes and I found the depth of focus shallow requiring lots of fiddling when scanning near/far compared to the SLC.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Messages
1,125
Ended up with the 15x mavens. I dont think I would want any more magnification for what I do.

Lil blacktail buck @1350ish yrds. Phone really did not want to focus for me...

1000000669.jpg
 
Top