100% powder burn... does it matter?

Brad1974

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 22, 2024
Messages
110
In your experience does getting 100% powder burn really matter?
A little history about why I ask the question. I have an old Rem 721 30-06 that I have spent years trying to get it to shoot tight groups. I stuck with mainly H4350 powder because it was supposed to be the gold standard for that cartridge in the bullet weight class I was using. I tried several bullets, fine tuned the loads and the seating depth, and just when I thought I finally had a good recipe that gave me some tight groups, I would get quite a bit of inconsistency and groups would open up. I watched several youtube videos that had mentioned using Gordons Reloading software, and one of the primary goals seemed to be to find powders that would burn 100%. I did my analysis on my rifle/rounds, and discovered I was getting somewhere around 90% powder burn. I read elsewhere that having incomplete powder burn could lead to inconsistency... I thought, well maybe that was my problem. I had been hoping to rebarrel my Rem 721 rifle into a 280 AI, and just ordered my barrel, so I won't get to try other powders in my 30-06. Now I will have all of the components I will need for my 280 AI except the powder... so, doing research in forums and in the GRT I have found a handful of options that appear to be good, and some that others are saying are good, but according to GRT are not getting 100% burn... so, back to my question. Does that even matter? Does incomplete powder burn cause inconsistency? I just want to find a powder that gets decent velocity (not looking for the fastest), shoots good groups, and gets reasonably good SD/ES. Can powders that don't burn 100% do that consistently? Or is it unimportant?
 
No idea but...........I try for 100 percent burn on the 308 with the Sythe ti. My thinking is suppressor is less likely to blow with powder not burning in it.
 
I would think that 100% powder burn would be the most efficient, therefore lower ES, but have never tested that theory at all and have not read any specific testing of that. With QL I try to work with loads that are 100% burn and close to case capacity.
 
I would think that 100% powder burn would be the most efficient, therefore lower ES, but have never tested that theory at all and have not read any specific testing of that. With QL I try to work with loads that are 100% burn and close to case capacity.

I would think that as well. I have just noticed that some of the most used powders in bith 280 Ai & in 30-06 are not 100% burnt, yet people must be getting decent results. I have read that having less than 100% burnt can increase inconsistency, but am curious if anyone kbow that to be true or untrue. I am curious, if you can get consistency with less than 100% burnt, how much mess than 100% will still give very good results? and how accurate is GRT when it comes to the % powder burn?
 
Back
Top