TaperPin
WKR
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2023
- Messages
- 6,223
It does bring up a good question of where reloaders get their data. Many of us like the layout of specific manuals or web pages. I’ve always liked the range of powders and velocities from Sierra. Hornady has always had a wider variety of cartridges and is a prime source for loads using their bullets. Nosler is compact and easy to thumb through and shows load %, which is nice to know if the reloader doesn’t care for heavily compressed loads. Hogdon has good reduced loads. Eventually, if you check enough sources there is information overload, duplication and no practical reason to try to get anything more exact since rifle and component variations are so large.
I’ve had a number of rifles that matched Nosler data so that seems to get used more than the others, followed by Sierra, then Hornady. No right or wrong answer. Over the years sometimes a manual will have an extra slow load, or a max that seems a little spicy and much of that is the lot of components and stacking of variances. Some lots of powder are just slower or faster.
I’ve had a number of rifles that matched Nosler data so that seems to get used more than the others, followed by Sierra, then Hornady. No right or wrong answer. Over the years sometimes a manual will have an extra slow load, or a max that seems a little spicy and much of that is the lot of components and stacking of variances. Some lots of powder are just slower or faster.