.03-06 bullet selection - elk out to 500 yards

[Sccritterkiller]

180gr NP work just fine on elk out of my 308...go with what you got..

 

[abbrown]

sorry to hijack a thread but does anyone have any experience or opinions on the 165 grain Sierra Tipped Gameking (gamechanger) on elk? my .30/06 wouldnt group the usual suspects of Accubonds or terminal ascent. it seems to love these TGK's in the sierra factory loading. just curious of their performance on elk. info I can find online varies from them being too soft and frangible to them being too hard and not expanding...

thanks!

I have taken one bull and multiple red stags and hinds with that cartridge/bullet up to maybe 350yds and all died quickly. For what it’s worth.

 

[Bluumoon]

The LRX is not a TTSX. It is designed to open down to 1600 according to Barnes testing but recommend to keep the bullet velocity at 1700-1800. The TTSX is 1900-2000fps minimum.

Source: Barnes Hunting Bullets

Fake news brother. Their version of what is acceptable is way different than mine. Half of the forum is dedicated to uncovering the BS the industry pushes. This is right up there.

 

[Bluumoon]

The LRX is not a TTSX. It is designed to open down to 1600 according to Barnes testing but recommend to keep the bullet velocity at 1700-1800. The TTSX is 1900-2000fps minimum.

Source: Barnes Hunting Bullets

Here, start at the beginning

Thread 'Why Match/Target Bullets For Hunting'

Jan 22, 2021

This is going to be a barrage of questions. It will help to view me as a skeptic relative to the matter at hand. I am going to do some load development for my new 6mm Creed. I live in the southeast where shots are rarely taken at more than 100 yards. But, I fancy that I will take a trip out west one day to hunt antelope, so I am going to do my load development with an eye toward the possibility that I might shoot out to say (for the sake of discussion) 500 yards. This is a hunting gun.

Time to order bullets. I see questions asked frequently across various forums asking about using...

• Fartrell Cluggins
• Replies: 342
• Forum: Firearms

• 

 

[TaperPin]

It helps to keep in mind factory loads and most 30-06 reloading data are tested to a 5% to 8% lower max pressure than other cartridges using the same case, like 25-06, 270, etc., so when most manuals are showing 2,700 fps or 2,750 fps for 180 gr bullets, when when loaded to what the case is capable of velocities into the 2,800 fps are common. For this old war horse 100 fps makes a lot of difference at 500 yards when guys are judging it based on velocity. Also, I’m guessing some folks are using data from sea level that seems pretty slow, or there are two different 180 gr Partitions so maybe they are using the semi spitzer?

Anyway, this first group is 180 gr. Partitions and the second is for 180 gr Accubond. No doubt about it, an Accubond has a higher bc (.507) than the Partition (.474), but at 500 yards it’s barely 50 fps difference and the way I zero, the trajectory is only an inch different. I’d have no hesitation whatsoever to take an elk with either bullet going 1,900 fps.

 

[The Guide]

The LRX is not a TTSX. It is designed to open down to 1600 according to Barnes testing but recommend to keep the bullet velocity at 1700-1800. The TTSX is 1900-2000fps minimum.

Source: Barnes Hunting Bullets

Kind of interesting that you trust Barnes marketing info but not Hornady marketing info. What gives one more credibility than the other? Just curious.

Jay